8-C to 9-A + Correction + Degradation of the sleeping giant of "Del Mar"

[ARCH0207]

This calc Puss in Boots 2: Giant It is done correctly but it is incorrect because it says that Puss is 2.5 ft or 0.762 m tall but in the first movie Kitty reveals that Puss is 2 ft or 0.6096 m tall, so I did the calculation with Puss's true height and the feat is 9-A and not 8-C, that is why the giant is 9-A and that is why the feat should be downgraded.
Shrek - Giant this is my calc
Here Kitty clearly says 2 ft or 0.6096 m is how tall Puss is.

 

[ARCH0207]

Please someone answer

 

[Dark-Carioca]

Please someone answer

If you want others to answer you need to ask staff members first (though I assume you've already done that)

 

[ARCH0207]

If you want others to answer you need to ask staff members first (though I assume you've already done that)

I already did it, I put it where they check the calculations and also in some profiles of the calculation group

 

[Therefir]

I agree with using the corrected calc with Puss' stated height.

Where did the 2.5 ft value came from anyway?

 

[ARCH0207]

I agree with using the corrected calc with Puss' stated height.

Where did the 2.5 ft value came from anyway?

Salma Hayek on Improvising in Puss In Boots: The Last Wish: 'It's Really Easy' It came from this article where it says that the director of the film says "For me, I think there's something in this adorable little cat, he is just a two-and-a-half-foot tall cat. But with Antonio's voice, the charisma, he has the bravado of an eight-foot-tall man, and there's something in that contrast that is both adorable and aspirational. I think that that's something that's very charming about it to me." But as Kitty said, 2 ft is more reliable than the director, plus 60.96 cm is more consistent with the height of a domestic cat.

 

[ARCH0207]

I agree with using the corrected calc with Puss' stated height.

Where did the 2.5 ft value came from anyway?

Can I make the changes now?

 

[Therefir]

Nope, my vote doesn't really count for content revision threads (even though I'm a content moderator).

Also it's a stat revision thread so it would still require 2 or 3 votes.

 

[ARCH0207]

Then just 1 or 2 more votes and the change is made

Nope, my vote doesn't really count for content revision threads (even though I'm a content moderator).

Also it's a stat revision thread so it would still require 2 or 3 votes.

 

[ARCH0207]

Nope, my vote doesn't really count for content revision threads (even though I'm a content moderator).

Also it's a stat revision thread so it would still require 2 or 3 votes.

Dark-Carioca and Therefir agree with the calculation, so I already have the 3 votes.
Comments

 

[Dark-Carioca]

Dark-Carioca and Therefir agree with the calculation, so I already have the 3 votes.
Comments

With all due respect, did you not read what Therefir said?

They said their vote didn't count xD (mine wouldn't either, as a CGM, so you need to ask other staff)

 

[AThe1412]

I mean, Kitty said "about 2 feet tall" which sounds more like a rough estimate than a precise one, and the 2.5 ft height apparently came from the director himself (also without taking things like his high heels into account). Not to mention, if the Giant is downgraded to 9-A+ the same way you wrote it in those unaccepted edits, then there's no reason why Puss who's 8-C should struggle to harm it. It should still be 8-C by virtue of scaling above Puss. At best, it'll lose its current KE.