• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

If you're going to delete my comments, in which i defend myself then just perma ban me, because i want nothing to do with such disingenuous treatment.
There is no need to feel personally attacked here. We just don't want our rvr thread to be spammed for a prolonged time by repetitive comments. I don't think that there is any personal offence meant towards you from our staff. 🙏❤️
 
respectfully, this guy's profile picture is unacceptable, and it's probably rule-breaking

It has a f*cking blurred sw*stika in the background and a picture of Sinister Mark (from Invincible) with a H*tler stache.

this can't be allowed
 
respectfully, this guy's profile picture is unacceptable, and it's probably rule-breaking

It has a f*cking blurred sw*stika in the background and a picture of Sinister Mark (from Invincible) with a H*tler stache.

this can't be allowed
Agreed; that profile image has to be removed ASAP, and the user should face some punishment for it.
 
If they refused to remove that image on their own, I think that a temporary ban might be in order. 🙏
 
Okay. Then a strict warning should probably be sufficient. 🙏
 
Yeah saw this a while ago and questioned him about it. @Mizuki67 anything you'd like to say in your defense?
Maybe due to Translation issues with Tensura

Second spoiler Translation

Here is the clarification part

These translations doesn't indicates any BDE or Acausality as far as I see.
 
TBH, it seems like a translation issue, since it likely came from an untranslated volume, meaning (Meaning while we thought it was true, it can no longer be used, until later)

To give some information, the outside of the space-time quantum seems to come from Yuuki from volume 22. (Something that was later decided to be not allowed)

But yeah, I still don't see the issue for BDE.


For a Note, something that is worth mentioning, is that only this specific part, is at question, not the entire thing.
Beyond-Dimensional Existence (Type 1; Information Particles transcend Space and Time,[38] and are unaffected by space and time in any way,[38] which extends to them being able to resist time stop)
Acausality (Type 1; Digital Lifeforms are not part of the space-time continuum, can easily move to any point in time[38] without being affected by space and time)
(The bolded part)
 
Last edited:
I made a thread on it, it is TL issue, i was saying i humbly accept making a mistake on justifying they exist outside the timeline since it mentions existing outside space time
Okay. What do other staff members here think about this issue? 🙏
 
Okay. What do other staff members here think about this issue? 🙏
I think it’s fine if it was a genuine mistake. The user just needs to be more careful next time and verify the scans before creating a CRT. Also that they should create a CRT to correct their mistake and remove the things added in the profile by them due to mistranslation.
 
I think it’s fine if it was a genuine mistake. The user just needs to be more careful next time and verify the scans before creating a CRT. Also that they should create a CRT to correct their mistake and remove the things added in the profile by them due to mistranslation.
Do we need to create a CRT for it, or can we just delete that part of the description for accasualty 1?
 
Hello.

GodlyCharmander wonders if he can be allowed to come back to our community after being banned for 3 years.


I personally do not mind, as I think that he has been punished enough for his transgressions, and he seems to have learned to behave considerably better. 🙏
 
Well, he has avoided making any socks for over a year at least, and with exception for when he exploded on AKM 3 years ago, he seemed to be well-behaved even back then from what I recall. 🙏
 
This is too serious of a case, but it kirks me off.

@Oblivion_Of_The_Endless in this thread has been deleting my messages on a soft ground of “derailment.” The problem is the said derailment wasn't long and it was advice on how to make better cases and arguments on a 0 thread. There's no bashfulness, resentment, or anything out of the ordinary. It didn't destroy the purpose of the thread, but petty sentiments are the reason why it was deleted. Now he says he didn't want further derailment when I stopped with that topic change, but he very clearly could have either voiced his opinion earlier or should of simply not responded since I clarified my point.

There have been cases of derailment all the time in most cases much worse than the case in the thread we were conversing. This isn't mod power abuse but it certainly needs to be voiced against the mods that you can't just freely do this on no-good grounds simply because they were advices wasn't on the topic and was handled as too “bad” to warrant a message deletion.

So slap him on the wrist or perhaps just say something unless this was a serious case of it then there should be a guideline to it. I'm appalled by such nonsense and hypocrisy, it rubbed me off the wrong way, and someone who has real cases of heavy derailment can't even delete anything, we remind the posters to stay on topic, and suchness is left because most time either the derailment was helpful or we just couldn't do anything. Derailments are common and most times are just minor things, this derailment was in good spirits and in no way was breaking anything in the rules of this wiki. I was actively conversing on the topic prior and was giving out some good advice. All that is taken away when the OP felt that a very small derailment warrants a deletion. Imagine if we could all do that.

If we commoners can't delete messages on much worse cases then I don't know why a mod should on matters that weren't groundbreaking and those messages being good advice. We, commoners, do not have the luxury of deleting stuff about the derailment, and this case is in poor taste which in no way should warrant message deletion.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top