- 3,929
- 2,043
Dude, this is the same thing as these, the characters in the comics are literally talking about the events happend in the past (in the serie) just like thisRead the places I've marked in bold, they all say that the show references comics (or other materials).
- Parallel Paradox: In Ben 10 it appears to us that there are 2 Paradox, the first is Paradox which we always see in the show but the second is Parallel Paradox it appeared in the Parallel Paradox comic and also Parallel Paradox appeared in the show.[1] Parallel Elena stated that the Vreedle Brothers tried to steal the Annihilargh device and it accidentally and destroy the universe, and Parallel Paradox stated that Ben, using Alien X, reshaped the universe and time, which was shown in the series.[2] They also mention the story of Elena, who appeared in the Ben 10 show[3] and movie.[4]
- Ben 10 classic TPB 2: In this comic, Ben remembers meeting a future version of himself, this meeting was featured in the show.[5] In one of the Scans, a reference is made about Ben 10.000 defeating Vilgax in the Future, which we have seen in the show what ben did to him.
- Vilgax Attack: Ben, Gwen, and Kevin are amazed that Mor Otesi is a real, which they thought was an legend in show,[9] also mentioned in the books, it actually exists.
Now, as for what you are talking about, I don't understand by what logic this has been accepted as Canon. The episode "So Long, and Thanks for All the Smoothies" was broadcast on 27/10/2012 and the episode "Hot Stretch" was broadcast on 03/11/2012. The mentioned comic book was published on 09/10/2013. Is it weird, are we saying the comics is Canon because the comics references the show? Seriously? Dude, with this logic, you can say all the comics are Canon.
Here is the calculation's link if the picture is hard to read
"Ben acquired his telepadan form, Armodrillo, when the ultimatrix sampled the DNA of Andreas" this is literally giving information about the episode when Ben scanned Andreas DNA, there are a lot of similiar infos like that just check the data book on ben 10 wiki
they are accepted as canon or alternative canon, i really won't argue about their canonicity on the show that is not the topic
"Material with direct narrative connections to the show are considered secondary canon."
The main discussion is about the calculation of the asteroid size not the feat's canonicity to the show (that was the Damage3245's actual point)We are talking about where the feat comes from, this is relevant to our topic.
"While there's technically no solid basis for the assumption of the number of asteroids present in the Talpaedan's asteroid belt, I can understand that assumption being used, but it seems problematic that Europa is being taken as the baseline for what a "small Moon" is for the calc. A quick example here shows that Europa is far from the smallest Moon in our Solar System:", "I think a more conservative mass value should be used for the average asteroid in this asteroid belt formed from the destruction of the Talpaedan's homeworld."
Last edited: