About Dimensions

[Sasukesama0492]

How many dimensions are places like the Void, that is, places that do not contain fiction?

 

[Sasukesama0492]

Bump

 

[PrinceofPein]

How many dimensions are places like the Void, that is, places that do not contain fiction?

You mean places that do not contain anything like matter?
well without any contexts they are just voids hence no dimensions since there is no matter in it to even decide what dimension the space is

 

[Sasukesama0492]

You mean places that do not contain anything like matter?
well without any contexts they are just voids hence no dimensions since there is no matter in it to even decide what dimension the space is

I get it

 

[Georredannea15]

You mean places that do not contain anything like matter?
well without any contexts they are just voids hence no dimensions since there is no matter in it to even decide what dimension the space is

What you say is correct. More precisely, as DT says here, we do not give any attribute to a space that has none of these natures or concepts, but a 3-D space takes its place so that such spaces can be equated to the tier in terms of "size".

Whether a structure that is stated to be above dimensions in a verse with only 4 dimensions is adequately modelled as 5D space is just of no relevance. Some might be. Some might not be (like your example). However, that is purely a question of the nature of the space, not a question of size. I think the size of such a space could very well be equalised to that of a 5D space. Think of a conceptless void, which is later replaced by a 3D universe. The void can't be modelled as space or dimension of any nature, as it lacks such concepts altogether, but in terms of "size", as we use it for tiering, it can be equalized to the 3D space that replaces it. Different isn't superior. I believe I mention that roughly every time we debate something tiering-related.