- 12,686
- 9,653
Tiers, yes. But they aren't as bad as most other pages here. And if the supporters don't want to fix it, then sure
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree with Confluctor, I dont think they quite deserve deletion yet but are definitely very outdated and need some reworks.Senshinkan
-This verse is too outdated
-There is only one userblog about the calculation for this verse
-There are only a two character profiles in this verse that have scan feats on their profiles
-Many supporters of this verse are no longer active or not interest to support this verse
Summaries and plagiarized content can easily be changed.Lack and scans and from what @Paul_Frank and @John985 said on Discord this pages plagiarize Type Moon wiki pages for the character
Summaries and plagiarized content can easily be changed.
Scans can also likely be found relatively easily enough.
For the scans, I need to know what I have to find and I'll search for them but this won't be easy honestly (lack of English translation)
Honestly? I don't see an issue with copying and pasting character summaries or whatnot. Or even notable attacks and stuff. There are no brownie points for coming up with original descriptions for everything. Why increase one's workload?
- Please do not plagiarize from other wikis or online databases. It is unprofessional and shows a lack of effort on the part of the user. If you are getting your information from another wiki, please rephrase and summarize the passage in your own words instead of simply copying it.
Didn't know such thread existed in the first placeThere's been a CRT in the works for the Lostbelts as a whole, where we gathered scans for every ability.
For some context, Lostbelt 2 is 11 hours long when boiled down to just its cutscenes. Finding the scans and collecting them has been a massive undertaking for the people who are working on said CRT.
Oh, in any case, I'll just remind we'd need a site-wide revision to go against the current standard.I am aware of the rule, just pointing out that is bad
Agreeing with this, not even for my personal case but in general, summaries can be rephrased but coping and pasting at least notable attacks shouldn't be a problem if they are good enoughI am aware of the rule, just pointing out that is bad
admins, bureaucrats, and content modsAbout that, sheer curiosity but who can erase profiles? Only admin or more?
Curiosity satisfied, thxadmins, bureaucrats, and content mods
Will say that from what I'm seeing some pages do scale to stuff in the verse so you should change the reasoning there (Like this one https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Brahma_(Monster_Strike) )Can someone please delete the following profiles:
Godzilla, Mothra, Mechagodzilla, Battra, King Ghidorah, Rodan, SpaceGodzilla, Gigan, Biollante, Destroyah, Shinji Ikari, and Asuka
I'm the author of these profiles, but the reason behind this decision of mine is that these profiles belong to Crossover characters with no story relevance in Monster Strike.
Honestly? I don't see an issue with copying and pasting character summaries or whatnot. Or even notable attacks and stuff. There are no brownie points for coming up with original descriptions for everything. Why increase one's workload?
Well, I don't think that we should be overly strict to the point of deleting otherwise good profile pages for these sort of reasons, unless the cases are very extreme, but we should still try to discourage plagiarism unless it is necessary/very hard to avoid.Agreeing with this, not even for my personal case but in general, summaries can be rephrased but copying and pasting at least notable attacks shouldn't be a problem if they are good enough
I deleted it.
Anyway, the tiers seems a bit wonk, but they aren't deletion worthy IMO. Do they lack scans? Yes, but not all files lacks them. Although they are in another language. So that's something
Perhaps somebody should start a content revision thread and summon the currently active verse supporters to there?I agree with Confluctor, I dont think they quite deserve deletion yet but are definitely very outdated and need some reworks.
Are you going to tell that user about their mistake?I deleted it.
That is going to take a long while given the lack of active supporters and lack of translations for any of the verse material.Perhaps somebody should start a content revision thread and summon the currently active verse supporters to there?
Thank you for the help.Are you going to tell that user about their mistake?
You're welcome.Thank you for the help.
I will do so.Are you going to tell that user about their mistake?
There were quite a lot of supporters listed though.That is going to take a long while given the lack of active supporters and lack of translations for any of the verse material.
Not all of them are active or willing to fix the verse at this time.There were quite a lot of supporters listed though.
@Antvasima anyways alongside the pages I found can I delete the rest of the Pretty Cure pages?you forgot Cure Peach who the fresh cures scale off of
If one does find themselves needing to copy/paste a section, you should credit the place where you got it from. Most content on wikis (including ours) is under a license where you're allowed to copy it as long as you give credit.Honestly? I don't see an issue with copying and pasting character summaries or whatnot. Or even notable attacks and stuff. There are no brownie points for coming up with original descriptions for everything. Why increase one's workload?
How do we credit it? With a link somewhere or we mention the original stuff?If one does find themselves needing to copy/paste a section, you should credit the place where you got it from. Most content on wikis (including ours) is under a license where you're allowed to copy it as long as you give credit.
Mention and a link at the top/bottom of the relevant section, iirc.How do we credit it? With a link somewhere or we mention the original stuff?
Only 12 of the pages actually scale to the calcs, the rest are as far as we can tell guesswork and based on questionable stuffSo just to be clear, what is the issue with the PC verse? If calculations exist and other characters scale to them, what makes those pages worse than the ones that performed the feats? Generally they're not very high quality but it doesn't seem inherently deletion-worthy.
Credit texts at the bottom of such pages seems like a reasonable solution, yes.If one does find themselves needing to copy/paste a section, you should credit the place where you got it from. Most content on wikis (including ours) is under a license where you're allowed to copy it as long as you give credit.
So just to be clear, what is the issue with the PC verse? If calculations exist and other characters scale to them, what makes those pages worse than the ones that performed the feats? Generally they're not very high quality but it doesn't seem inherently deletion-worthy.
Are you all absolutely certain that the higher statistics (Low 2-C and similar) are based on guesswork rather than explicitly shown feats that have been mentioned in the relevant Pretty Cure character profile pages?Only 12 of the pages actually scale to the calcs, the rest are as far as we can tell guesswork and based on questionable stuff
Also the only 2 supporters want it nuked
So only said 12 pages stay with the rest being in theory redone later