You can't seriously be trying to use the fact that Asgore "stomped" a child monster as a feat of strength, are you? Undyne is strong, especially compared to other monsters, sure; but you only meet Undyne
after her training with Asgore's completed, and she's already among the strongest monsters in the Underground. Dragging out the Human Monster war is also no better. Not only do we not have any indication how long the war lasted, there WERE no human casualties, meaning any kinda prolonged conflict would have had to occur by either guerilla tactics, or shields of meat; that is not strength. And again, with Undyne, she only defeated him in
training. There's no inference here; there's no way Asgore was fighting to kill, or fighting at full-power during training. And being defeated by Frisk is again, not an indicator of Frisk's strength, but rather the depth of Asgore's guilt and desire to be with his family again. This is not me ignoring points; everything I say here is either backed by evidence as stated in-game, or a fair inference based on such evidence. I've no interest in downplaying one character, just to make another look good.
Now, as for your "majority of monsters are Small Building Level," I will admit, that got me thinking. (Even if it's wrong, since, the only indication I can find of this is Undyne lifting a boulder, and she is WELL above the "average" monster.) So, let's take another look at the Waterfall Glyphs I cited earlier. "
It would take the SOUL of nearly every monster... ... just to equal the power of a single human SOUL." I realized something upon reading this. It makes
no mention of physical strength, rather the strength of a SOUL, which is more magic-based than anything else. So, if human's souls are so much more powerful than monster's SOULs, what does that mean? It means that Undyne's Small Building level feat...
is IRRELEVANT to a debate on the power of SOULs!
This opens up the possibility that humans and monsters are not imbalanced on a physical scale, but on a spiritual scale! Meaning there is no evidence that the physical OR Soul-based power of an Undertale human is any greater than one you might find in real life. Now, before you throw my words back on me about evidence and inference, I say this. There is variability in uncertainty. The possibility does exist that UT-Humans could be superhuman, the high end of my analogous abacus, or they COULD be just regular human-level. If we put this aside for just a second that leaves us with one thing I already touched upon...
So we have a range of uncertainty AND a clear and fair comparison to work with, meaning the most likely answer...is that Frisk's Physical and Spiritual powers are merely average, human-level if you will, while a monster's Physical powers are similar to a humans, but their Spiritual powers, the ones they
actually use to attack you are vastly inferior to a human's average power-level.
Now...since I got my Edgeworth gif, and I'm all in the mood, let me ask. How will you reply? What evidence do you have to immobilize the bead of this abacus and break the Range of Uncertainty?
Now, onto your other points... For what you say about Razor Sonic, I can see how your point would apply...if the Razor Sonic attack WAS just a simple razor-blade. To that, I present this, Razor Sonic's in-game description:
"Sword Tech/Chop to bits." Sounds pretty clear...
cut...right? Wrong. Let's take a look at the animation again.
Do you notice something about it? Multiple strikes occur simultaneously. And with the description I shared, this is specifically listed as "Sword Tech," meaning it IS Oersted himself doing this, and not a magic, disembodied spell he cast. Now, I'll be the first to admit, my math isn't perfect so apologies if I'm wrong here, I'll try not to make too many assumptions, but, assuming Oersted at minimum is moving and slashing faster than the human eye can track, that would put his
minimum at 17500 meters per second. Sans is quick, yes, but as seen with Frisk's final blow, his reaction speed isn't NEARLY that fast.
Therefore, I stand my ground that Razor Sonic would ABSOLUTELY be able to hit Sans with at least one of its strikes.
If it's been debunked, why have you not presented this? We're far from out of evidence, and, honestly, I think I've proven my case in more than one of the points available. All of Frisk's armor (except for the temy armor) had been owned by a previous fallen human. I imagine the point that's been made is that each of these items holds some kind of significance, some kind of emotional bond that allows them to resist magic-based attacks, yes? Now, again, Sans' Atk and Def are both 1. And Sans deals damage via Karmic Retribution, dealing 1 point of damage per "tick," and applying the Soul Poison effect you mentioned yesterday. Now, sure, let's go under the assumption that Sans can ignore all forms of armor, and I could see the reasoning for that. Even the Faded Ribbon, (Bandage doesn't grant any Damage Reduction) the least-protective piece of armor, tied with Cloudy Glasses, would make Sans deal zero damage per tick. But...how does this help him fight Oersted? Oersted wiped out Lucretia, meaning his "Love" level should be equal to that of Frisk/Chara. Maybe even better, because literally everyone native to Lucretia is dead, while in Undertale, you were capped at level 19 until you killed Sans. This would give Oersted a similar degree of survivability to Soul Manipulation to Frisk/Chara.
To address your final point, if this stuff has been debunked, why don't you present it? You followed this up by immediately saying "both sides have their evidence burnt out," meaning you don't...really have an argument left, do you? If I wasn't tired from being sick and needed to take a break every now and again, I could do this all day, because most of what you're saying has a flimsy basis to begin with, and supports itself using evidence from other, third-party sources. My logic isn't perfect, there is no such thing, and I've only started really getting into Battle-Writing, research, and debating two months ago. I'm a virtual newbie, so there's got to be cracks in my metaphorical armor. You just need some direct, solid evidence that hasn't been presented yet...
Now, I don't mean to aggravate you, but I'd like to ask you to tone down a bit there, friend. You sound a little angry, and as I've said, this is nothing more than a civil debate. If you need a moment to relax and calm down, by all means, take it. We don't need to continue this debate if you don't want to.