-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
staff abuser
- Thread starter koichi_
- Start date
- Status
- 29
- 0
- Thread starter
- #4
literally the staffs excluded because they were refuted, lol
- 16,991
- 12,156
Staff members are the reason why I stay awake every night. Staff members are the reason of my nightmares, staff members and their bloodlusted conquest of seeking the ultimate power to abuse, the power to say no to my CRT's! Oh the humanity!
On a serious note, even if there are staff who do abuse power. (Which there are.) bringing it up here isn't gonna do anything. If you have any issues bringing it up here isn't gonna help you, either bring it up to a HR member or leave it to yourself.
On a serious note, even if there are staff who do abuse power. (Which there are.) bringing it up here isn't gonna do anything. If you have any issues bringing it up here isn't gonna help you, either bring it up to a HR member or leave it to yourself.
- 12,767
- 15,298
You're getting banned soon, but I'ill try to explain you this. We are dealing with this bullshit since before you even joined VS debating, 2016 iirc. We have rules about it. Nothing in that thread is new, we basically read every single novel and searched for every single feat.
I mean come on, if Naruto was legit a Tier 2 character you'd be seeing feats of this Tier in the manga and you wouldn't need a juggle using non canon stuff to get this Tier
I mean come on, if Naruto was legit a Tier 2 character you'd be seeing feats of this Tier in the manga and you wouldn't need a juggle using non canon stuff to get this Tier
- 29
- 0
- Thread starter
- #7
this shit literally is a wikia, it needs to be well organized and fair, yes a team that abuses power is harmful to the wikia, not just in excluding topics but in many other things.
- 29
- 0
- 6,922
- 8,087
- 5
- 1
kid carente atencao
- 29
- 0
- Thread starter
- #14
idk, I was in the discussion and when I came back it was already out, I didn't see who did, but I saw that it was for nothing
- 29
- 0
- Thread starter
- #15
vc
- 16,991
- 12,156
- 6,419
- 7,022
Also, your comment above was censored not a good sign
- 34,591
- 35,024
Do you ever wonder why it is always brand new users posting these topics on here, and not the dozens of experienced, knowledgeable members who have been debating Naruto for years (and many of those knowledgeable individuals are vety often supporters of the verse)?
Ever wonder that?
- 29
- 0
- Thread starter
- #20
explain better, the sentences are without a comma, I can't understand it very well
- 6,419
- 7,022
Refute what? I only know the basics when it comes to Naruto scaling, it doesn't take much to know that Naruto isn't 2-C
- 12,767
- 15,298
we don't at least
- 6,922
- 8,087
- 29
- 0
- Thread starter
- #25
literally, you don't know if he debates on discord, tumblr, facebook etc, he may have just created it now looking for more people to discuss it, he wouldn't necessarily be a beginner in such a topic
- 29
- 0
- Thread starter
- #27
huh
- 6,419
- 7,022
Agree FRA
- 6,922
- 8,087
maybe we can revise them like a deck of cards?
- 10,995
- 16,265
2022 be ballin!
- 34,591
- 35,024
Where else somebody debates is completely irrelevant. That would still make them a beginner of this forum / wiki.
- 29
- 0
- Thread starter
- #33
really, I cursed the guy for the emotion of the moment, but ok
- 29
- 0
- Thread starter
- #36
there was literally nothing wrong there, just people debating such a topic, no offense or anything.
- 6,922
- 8,087
https://cdn.**********.com/attachments/831888264922529832/927996256410800159/unknown.png
- 12,430
- 17,706
The thread was closed because there was nothing of substance worth discussing in it, no offense. It was full of misinformation and misinterpretations, and wasn't that well organized. I understand that the user was very new, so I'm not expecting him to produce the best CRT out there. I certainly couldn't do much better when I first started out. But that's exactly why your first post shouldn't be an extremely controversial CRT for one of the most popular and controversial verses.
The thread was closed for good reason, and that's the end of that. My apologies if I've offended anyone, but staff are responsible for filtering content at the end of the day.
The thread was closed for good reason, and that's the end of that. My apologies if I've offended anyone, but staff are responsible for filtering content at the end of the day.
- 29
- 0
- Thread starter
- #39
lol
- Status
Similar threads
