- 4,266
- 2,105
Basically title. Was curious because I looked at the DB Cosmology thread, and didn't want to derail. I saw mixed answers.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I have a asked in a DB thread "Who is for the 3-A downgrade?" and nobody agrees with it, but all them agree with Low 1-C upgrade of course . I see a lot of favors and bias against it in the CTR. Matt seemingly admitted to be against the upgrade solely that it won't get a higher than Saint Seiya as an example.Not by default, the individual spatial and temporal dimensions need context of being infinite in scale before we can assume tier 1 stuff. It is possible for an 11-dimensional hyper timeline to only be planet level if the respective spatial dimensions happen to be that small. But a simple Timeline within a timeline is not evidence of Low 1-C structure, hence why Zelda timelines aren't Low 1-C.
Most of times I saw Matt he disagrees with any Upgrades in many Verses without even reading the context or understanding it fullyI have a asked in a DB thread "Who is for the 3-A downgrade?" and nobody agrees with it, but all them agree with Low 1-C upgrade of course . I see a lot of favors and bias against it in the CTR. Matt seemingly admitted to be against the upgrade solely that it won't get a higher than Saint Seiya as an example.
Bruh seriously. He doesn't even provide evidence to back up his claims and then say people claims are nonsense without prove.Most of times I saw Matt he disagrees with any Upgrades in many Verses without even reading the context or understanding it fully
He has a wank boner for Marvel and DC. Even when I debunked 2-A Spectre and Anti-Monitor. He wanted to close the thread instead of refuting my evidence.Bruh seriously. He doesn't even provide evidence to back up his claims and then say people claims are nonsense without prove.
Not attacking don't care what he has done but why call people claims nonsense then have nothing to back it up.Guys, do not publicly attack Matt behind his back. Also, he hasn't actually agreed with every "Wank" think for Marvel or DC either. He agrees that Superman Post-Crisis is never reaching beyond 4-B, and he also disagreed heavily with Low 1-A Thor. Both of which I do agree with him on both cases, so he's not as biased as people say he is. And he used to be a lot more constructive and reasonable, but at the same time, he doesn't deserved to be slandered for it.