- 7,444
- 3,815
It's due to the fact they need to hit in all time points to kill him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Silver talked about destroying the past, present and future all at once. Shadow agreed that it should be possible with Sonic, and Eggman knows that it's the only way to defeat Solaris, stating that "defeating it here, now would do nothing". His reasoning being that Solaris is a super-dimensional life form who exists in the past, present, and futureThey said something similar to that, I think?
Yeah. I mean no disrespect, but like, that doesn't seem like much to ask for at allAll I want is an actual explanation on why immesurable isn't valid that goes further than "no, it doesn't fit x standards/how I think the fight should go, etc", so far the only explanation I seen tried to remove actual canon abilities, the burden of proof is on the downgrade side to prove why the feat isn't usable and thus downgrade them, not just "this doesn't fit standards", just explain why, that's all, at least for me
And it has been explained several times.All I want is an actual explanation on why immesurable isn't valid that goes further than "no, it doesn't fit x standards/how I think the fight should go, etc", so far the only explanation I seen tried to remove actual canon abilities, the burden of proof is on the downgrade side to prove why the feat isn't usable and thus downgrade them, not just "this doesn't fit standards", just explain why, that's all, at least for me
Immeasurable speed does not help one avoid temporally omnipresent attacks
Depictions on screen of the battle itself does not show anything that indicates immeasurable speed
That's essentially what the argument against immeasurable is.
These are the core reasons (at least for me) why immeasurable doesn't work here.That was a poorly organized paragraph structure. But none of that is legit Immeasurable speed; it's already been discussed multiple times it doesn't require Immeasurable speeds to fight someone with temporal omnipresence. And the barrier argument really isn't speed at all but AoE. "Solaris doesn't need to physically move to black Sonic's assault" that's not speed at all but just passively blocking it; which is not reactions at all.
But also, an attack that is omnipresent across time and space cannot be dodged period even with Immeasurable speed; it's an AoE attack not a reaction speed feat. But it's only omnipresent on a temporal level and not a spatial level; which is admittedly weird, but an attack like that can still be dodged with someone with regular speed. Having "Temporal omnipresence" is a different ability altogether and doesn't mean anything speed wise. And the rest is still just redundancy, the core argument is still requiring an attack with temporal omnipresent AoE.
You never said thisand I say why it doesn't fit standards,
This doesn't debunk immesurable per say, only that not even immesurable is enough, that's your only reason that you honestly refuse to even accept any counters to thisNow, it is then said that to avoid temporal omnipresence, immeasurable does not help due to how immeasurable speed can't be used to move one's past self (also future self) who would still be in the way of the attack if it was dodged.
This isn't an explanation, this is just your interpretation, you didn't explain why it doesn't, it just doesn't indicate in your opinion, and you don't accept any counters to this, completelyNot just that, but depictions on screen do not indicate anything that would agree with immeasurable speed, and I'm not listing it out again because all of you were there (Theuser789, Axxtentacle, and Peptocoptr27) when these points were tackled previously.
Stop with this standards, explain why it doesn't fit standards and stop ignoring opposing argumentsThat is the explanation as to why Immeasurable speed does not work. Nothing has been provided to say that it fits the current standards so immeasurable speed should be removed.
You never said this
Because even if the present self moves out of the way, immeasurable speed doesn't allow you to move your past self out of the way of an attack. So, past sonic would still get hit. Now immeasurable speed does allow them to dodge after being struck (as strange as that sounds) but they're never depicted as doing anything of the like so there is nothing to back it up there either.
I disagree. When you don't know the answer to a question, you just say you don't know the answer to the question also known as Unknown
Because immeasurable speed only allows you to dodge after being hit, it's never communicated that they were struck in the gameplay then dodged in any form or shape. So the attacks aren't really properly depicted as omnipresent throughout all of time.
Because Immeasurable speed doesn't let you move your past yourself. There would still be an indication that they got hit and then move to avoid it. Especially since you're playing from their perspective. But there is no sign of that ever in the game. Without it, immeasurable speed has no support.
This is me repeating several times why they're on screen showings does not indicate immeasurable speed.Without indication, we have no visual proof of the hedgehogs being immeasurable. All them dodging without ever showing any signs of being hit does is indicate that the attacks themselves are not omnipresent throughout all of time. And if the developers didn't think of how fast you need to be to dodge something temporally omnipresent, maybe they didn't treat the attacks as temporally omnipresent either. Instead, they just programmed the game so that the models swapped out in place of one another with a press of a button, while never changing anything else due to never thinking about it.
I've debunked both of them, but none of my points were properly addressed. If I need to repeat myself, I'll re-iterate.These are the core reasons (at least for me) why immeasurable doesn't work here.
Several times, I've personally repeated this.
This isn't an explanation, this is just your interpretation, you didn't explain why it doesn't, it just doesn't indicate in your opinion, and you don't accept any counters to this, completely
And this is my reply to this exact line of thinking that you have in that post, all you are saying is that the fight doesn't apply because it doesn't fit how you think how it should go, which is not an explanation, even being a staff member doesn't mean your interpretation is an argument in of itselfThis doesn't debunk immesurable per say, only that not even immesurable is enough, that's your only reason that you honestly refuse to even accept any counters to this
Stop with this standards, explain why it doesn't fit standards and stop ignoring opposing arguments
If that's the your only reason that that's that, I disagree with you but I can't mind control you and you are extremely close minded about this topic anyways, just note that people are going to question this because those explanations are pretty subpar
And I don't agree with your debunk, I believe it wrong.I've debunked both of them, but none of my points were properly addressed. If I need to repeat myself, I'll re-iterate.
The fact that they can pull off a feat even an immeasurable character shouldn't be capable of just makes this even more impressive. I'm not saying Super Sonic has irrelevant speed or anything. Just look at it this way: If Solaris's temporal omnipresence was across most of time instead of all of it, if he existed everywhen except for the earliest past and the latest future, no one would argue against immeasurable speed since dodging Solaris's attacks would require zipping between the beginning and the end of time constantly and instantly. That's about as Immeasurable as you can get, but since the Super forms' scaling is more impressive than that, it's suddenly innaplicable so they're just MFTL+. That makes no sense. You might say that allowing Super Sonic to upscale from immeasurable also makes no sense, but that's still what the fight implies. Other characters on the Wiki have immeasurable speed via blitzing other immeasurable characters after all, and since VS debating is all about applying logic to feats that scientifically make no sense, why should this be any different? If not that, then it implies the hedgehogs have the same omnipresence as Solaris along with his temporal AoE, which as I already explained, can grant the same benefits as Immeasurable speed. If Super Sonic isn't simply immeasurable, we'd have to create a new speed rank called "omnipresent+" or "omnipresent (through time)". Either way, he should be able to keep up with Immeasurable characters so what's the point? Immeasurable speed by itself can grant users temporal AoE and omnipresence (if the user choses to use it that way) anyway! So there's hardly any difference. If you remove immeasurable speed, you'd have to replace it with temporal AoE AND omnipresence, which in turn would bring Super Sonic's speed rank back to the way it was and make him even more OP and harder to kill than before. Do you not see the hypocrisy here?
And all you're saying is that his fight applies because you think that it does fit how it should go. That's literally all that this is and that doesn't invalidate either of our arguments.And this is my reply to this exact line of thinking that you have in that post, all you are saying is that the fight doesn't apply because it doesn't fit how you think how it should go, which is not an explanation, even being a staff member doesn't mean your interpretation is an argument in of itself
Legit just read the rest of my post:
No, immeasurable speed doesn't give you the ability to move your past self and future self. Never is that said on the page, I don't think its ever been said in any thread before this one, and I bet you can't find any instance (that is not this very one you're trying to argue) where that's ever been shown. And the characters wouldn't be simulating temporal omnipresence, they'd be simulating full-on omnipresence if what you said worked. Even more, if even a single one of them were able to do that, the hedgehogs wouldn't acquire all three of them to battle Solaris, only one of them would be needed, so your argument falls apart even there.Also, immeasurable speed CAN allow you to move your past self and you future self. Time is meaningless to someone with Immeasurable speed. They can just zip back and forth between the beginning and end of time at infinite speeds to simulate temporal omnipresence. That's why Super Sonic had immeasurable speed to begin with. It solves every problem Solaris brought to the table all at once. It can grant temporal AoE (which technically means we don't need to add it to Sonic's profile since he already had it), and temporal omnipresence if Sonic wants it to, which in this case, was necessary. Meanwhile, temporal omnipresence naturally grants temporal AoE and can also grant spatial omnipresence and immeasurable speed benefits if the user wants it to. The same way a character with infinite speed can decide to be omnipresent throughout space by flying through the entire volume of the universe for as long as they want. They become everywhere they want to be by this point, which can be asolutely EVERYWHERE at once given how thier speed litterally has no limit
Bro, you just parroted what I said, damm, as I said, since this a downgrade thread the burden of proof to explain on why something isn't immesurable is on the downgrade side, you all need to make a post explaining why this feat doesn't reach the standards, why the fight doesn't work as a immesurable should go, which you haven't, you have stated stuff, but not backed up your points, just being staff doesn't mean you can just say stuff and that be evidence by itself, especially when the burden of proof is on you, and I can guarante we at least explained why what we say is immesurable, unlike the opposition. I already know the downgrade is going anyways, I want this out of cortesy and because people will complain laterAnd all you're saying is that his fight applies because you think that it does fit how it should go. That's literally all that this is and that doesn't invalidate either of our arguments.
First of all, I'm commenting on the "Just because other verses screwed it up, doesn't mean we should throw everything under the bus". I mean no offence, but this sounds like cherry picking. But I'll actually explain other details regardless.That's what we've been doing from the start and it's getting us nowhere. We're already at page 8 of this thread. We need to look at the bigger picture if we want to settle this for real.
Just because many franchises screw up the logistics of temporal omnipresence doesn't mean we should throw every feat under the bus, especially those who have pretty solid backbone to them and pretty much no contradictions.
So is this the difference that I asked you to specify in my last post? I don't get it. All I see when I read this is "Immeasurable characters need to physically move in order to be beyond linear time, while Solaris doesn't even need to lift a finger"
I'd have to see an example of this to see how it compares to what we're currently discussing.
I actually agree in the sense that space-omnis should tie in a race againsts someone with infinite speed. Time-omnis like Solaris are the same, but with Immeasurables. This makes more sense when you keep in mind that space is a 3D concept, while time is a 4D one. Let's compare the benefits of infinite speed to those of space omnipresence to paint a clearer picture and then we'll get to the part where we start to disagree.
Infinite speed:
++ Can travel to any destination within a 3D space in a litteral instant
++ Can see anyone with a finite speed rank as completely frozen
++ Can cross infinite distances
++ Should be able to replicate a space-omni's benefits by moving through the entire volume of the universe for as long as they need (given said universe is finite or they don't suffer from the drawback seen directly below ⬇)
-- May require a finite time frame to cross an infinite distance for some reason
-- Initially lack the same sense of awareness that space-omnis have
-- Appear completely frozen to immeasurable characters
-- Without context, should be assumed to have far worse survivabillity than a space-omni
Space omnipresence (within 1 universe):
++ Already where they need to be before the infinite thinks of going there
++ Depending on the cosmology of thier verse, may occupy an infinite space
++ Should be able to attack at infinite speed (in theory)
++ Can see and feel everything everywhere, granting better awareness instantly
++ Without context, should be assumed to have far better survivabillity than an infinite (needs to be killed everywhere in space)
-- Doesn't necessarily see characters of finite speed as statues
-- May be limited in thier attack speed due to bad writing
Now let's compare that to the differences between an immeasurable and a time-omni so I can properly convey why I think temporal omnipresence does at least grant infinite reaction speed
Immeasurable:
++ Can travel to any destination within a 4D space in an instant
++ Can see anyone with a finite or infinite speed rank as frozen
++ Can dodge an attack that's already hit them (in theory)
++ Can replicate the benits of an infinite, and a space-omni
++ Should be able to replicate the benefits of a time-omni by travelling between the beginning and end of time at infinite speeds (given that time in said timeline isn't endless or they don't suffer from the drawback seen directly below ⬇)
-- May require a finite time frame to travel through an infinite amount of time for some reason
-- Initially lack the awareness that time-omnis have
-- May not be able to dodge an attack that's already hit them due to bad writing
-- Without context, should be assumed to have far worse survivabillity than a time-omni
Time-omni (accross all of time):
++ Already where and when they need to be before the immeasurable thinks of going there (they already reached thier destination in the very beginning of time)
++ Can see anyone with a finite speed rank as frozen (due to thier future actions being seen in excruciating detail by the time-omni down to the smallest imaginable time frame)
++ Can replicate the benefits of an infinite and a space-omni via always staying where they were and already being where they're going (should they choose to fill the entire volume of the universe with thier presence, they can, and since they're already present in the future, the time that they would normally take to do so is irrelevant)
++ Can see and feel everything and around them accross every time period at once, and can spread this superior awareness across the universe simply through moving at thier own pace by virtue of already being in the future
++Without context, should have far better survivabillity than an immeasurable (needs to be killed everywhen in time)
It is, actually. If you attack him in the present (whatever "your" present may be), Solaris would be able to see exactly what you, and every other living thing that ever was in his line of sight, is up to. He would know what they've done, what they're doing , and what they will do in that place. He'll know what your exact intentions are in less than an instant before you know it yourself, and yeet a meteor at your past, present and future self all at once. Unless you're immeasurable AND capable of hitting someone through multiple points in time, how do you stand a chance against him?
I've proven my positive so the ball is in your court
Except we clearly see that Solaris's attacks are in every point in time at once when you switch to a character in a different time period, and Solaris would have to be really stupid to just attack and at one point in time when he exists in all of them. The same can be said for other omnipresent characters who attack in only one spot, but again, I haven't seen any example and we can't disregard every feat involving omnipresence just because some writers don't know how it specifically works. I can't believe I'm saying this, but Sonic 06's writers somewhat succeeded where many others failed.
I may have dug myself in a deep hole I won’t escape by starting a keyboard war of huge paragraphs, but I really feel it's the only way to finally truly settle this. I know that immeasurable Sonic is going to be brought up in threads for all of eternity if we don't throw everything on the table in this one. If you have any better solution, I'd be glad to hear it, and if anyone is willing to take my place in case I get tired of this conversation, I would greatly appreciate it
People stop using this argument, like seriously, this already has been explained how time wasn't distorded where the fight actualy took place, this is misleading for anyone who reads your post, if you think this is a valid point then adress the countersAlso, time is distorted, which creates even more doubt for Infinite or Immeasurable speeds.
Shadow is directly quoted as saying the instability of time caused this time-space rift, which pretty clearly indicates that both time and space, not to mention the strange state of the world they're all located in.People stop using this argument, like seriously, this already has been explained how time wasn't distorded where the fight actualy took place, this is misleading for anyone who reads your post, if you think this is a valid point then adress the counters
Also drop this "proving the negative", this is one of the most misused arguments I seen when the opposition doesn't want to debate, the pro side already proven their points, however the opposite side has not proven their claims when countering it, instead making arguments based on authority based on "standards", the burden of proof is on you now, a negative shouldn't necessaraly be proven however when it is countered it has to be
In court the defendant lawyer doesn't need to prove that their client is innocent, however they have too after the prosecution has show evidence, simply saying "I don't need to prove a negative" wouldn't work in that case
Like seriously, I already accepted immesurable is going, I am saying you need to explain shit because in the future there will be people confused and questioning this, heck in this thread this has happened before it even finished, explaining it does more good for you than it does for me
Solaris wasn't in the intersection, he was clearly outside of it, that already debunks your point, if Solaris was inside of it he wouldn't use his eyes to attack itShadow is directly quoted as saying the instability of time caused this time-space rift, which pretty clearly indicates that both time and space, not to mention the strange state of the world they're all located in
So, time-space everywhere but in that one area with Solaris was distorted? That's what you want to go with?Solaris wasn't in the intersection, he was clearly outside of it, that already debunks your point, if Solaris was inside of it he wouldn't use his eyes to attack it
I am going with canon, that space was only distorted in that area, geez you completely inverted my pointSo, time-space everywhere but in that one area with Solaris was distorted? That's what you want to go with?
So, time-space everywhere but in that one area with Solaris was distorted? That's what you want to go with?
And just because it was addressed doesn't mean I agree with it. Not only is there a direct statement that they're in a place where space-time is distorted, but since the entire world has been ruined it would be strange for Solaris to just have one area that also isn't being affected by them trying to destroy all of the timelines.Solaris not being in the intersection is made clear in the cutscenes, as only its shadow appearing from outside the bubble is shown before and after the fight. Cutscenes come before gameplay.
The intersection topic was already addressed 1st page of this thread. Also saying "That's what you want to go with?", completely ignores every other person in this thread that has already talked about this point. Bad staff bad.