- 2,443
- 316
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
The reactions page
- Thread starter Gwynbleiddd
- Start date
-
- Tags
- reactions
- 1,670
- 145
Looks good man
- 3,260
- 293
We have a rule regarding reactions here. In the rules page, it states that:
I would like DT's opinion on regarding subject on this. However, if necessary, I am willing to re-write the reactions page according to KKapoios' values in the blog.
| Reaction speed has both a distance and a timeframe component, so all calculations that are completed for reaction speed cannot simply be a timeframe by itself. Do not randomly assume a 1 meter distance for each timeframe and use that speed for the reaction speed. |
- 3,260
- 293
I have messaged DT about this thread. He will come shortly.
- 2,512
- 261
Hmm... That is for the perception values, correct?
Well, I believe that the reaction time values we currently have were an undiscussed standard (I don't quite remember what was said regarding them in the last thread about the reactions page).
Technically I am in favor of ranking them after a system we know the reasoning of and the 1 meter standard to get the timeframe doesn't sound unreasonable.
Implementation wise one has to keep in mind though, that this would be a ranking system change. So we would have to find and change all profiles that currently have such reactions listed and change them.
While I think not all too many profiles have those, I also don't know if we can effectively filter the profiles to find those that need to be looked at. So making such a change could be some major searching effort.
Well, I believe that the reaction time values we currently have were an undiscussed standard (I don't quite remember what was said regarding them in the last thread about the reactions page).
Technically I am in favor of ranking them after a system we know the reasoning of and the 1 meter standard to get the timeframe doesn't sound unreasonable.
Implementation wise one has to keep in mind though, that this would be a ranking system change. So we would have to find and change all profiles that currently have such reactions listed and change them.
While I think not all too many profiles have those, I also don't know if we can effectively filter the profiles to find those that need to be looked at. So making such a change could be some major searching effort.
- 167,863
- 76,487
Well, given how few profiles that seem to have used it (I have kept track of most things in this wiki, and don't recall seeing it), as opposed to simply usually giving characters the same combat and reaction speed, I think that we can simply change the page, and let members gradually modify statistics if they notice anything.
- 2,443
- 316
- Thread starter
- #12
So should we update the page now or wait for more input?
- 2,443
- 316
- Thread starter
- #14
I've updated the page.I think we shouldn't close this in case of an objection.
- 11,582
- 549
This seems okay enough, i guess...
- 2,773
- 126
I have no problem, we can edit the profiles gradually if needed
- 11,582
- 549
So like add "(insert speed level) perception" or something like that, yes?
- 11,582
- 549
Fair enough.
- 3,260
- 293
I can clean up the page so it looks more presentable, if you guys need.
Edit: Nvm, it looks clean. Also, should the term "infinitely swift" perception be added for characters with infinite speed?
Edit: Nvm, it looks clean. Also, should the term "infinitely swift" perception be added for characters with infinite speed?
Similar threads
