• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The Bulk revisions

Stalker_Maggot

Stalker_Maggot

Messages
10,819
Reaction score
254
"At least City level (Survived a point blank nuclear explosion, although it is unknown how powerful the bomb was)"


Why would we assume it is 7-B when it literally says that it is unknown how strong the bomb is?
 
Oblivion Of The Endless said:
No there isnt. The nuke's potency is unknown so we cant use the higher end...at all
Click to expand...
We could apply the same logic to the lower end.

We could have it say "at least 8-A, possibly ___" (with the blanks being filled with some sort of compromise).
 
The tier 8 nukes are weird oddities (there's an 8-B one that's like a nuclear rocket launcher), but 8-A or Low 7-C would be fine I'd think
 
People seem to most often use 7-C for nuke statistics, but it may be good to start standardizing that to 8-B
 
@BigSmoke

No

The lower end can be used because thats its purpose, the baseline amount of the power of a nuke

7-A has no basis at all, and even then, only some specific kind of nuke can reach that level. Saying that Bulk's feat is possibly 7-A is baseless and headcanon
 
7-A is literally 1 bomb, and wasn't even tested at that yield because the plane probably wouldn't escape alright and it would generate a massive amount of fallout. It definitely wouldn't be that.
 
A warhead is just the bomb part of a missile. That 8-B one has a warhead.
 
At least 8-A then, probably be good to make a thread to handle more pages scaling to generic nukes
 
I mean there was a jet that dropped a nuclear warhead on him.

(He was in the epicenter of the explosion btw)
 
Being at the epicenter just means you do not have to go through the bother of applying the inverse square law as far as I am aware.
 
Promestein said:
At least 8-A then, probably be good to make a thread to handle more pages scaling to generic nukes
Click to expand...
This seems to make sense.
 
No you can get that even on conventional bombs
 
Bulk's size is hella inconsistent. Sometimes he's not even that big.
 
Does somebody know if there is an official list of different nuclear explosion energy yields, from low to average to the highest, that we can use for a Weapons profile format "Nuclear Explosions" page here? I think that it would be useful as a reference for us.
 
Perhaps somebody should start a new content revision thread for what I just mentioned?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Just_Butchering
Let me cook (possible tier 7 The Boys)
Replies
25
Views
2K
Cropfist
Cropfist
Ednaxel2
  • Locked
Transformers Animated: 7-B+ Upgrade & Inorganic Physiology
Replies
33
Views
1K
Ednaxel2
Ednaxel2
RWBY: Maiden scaling to Semblances and the Mantle Bomb
Replies
34
Views
2K
ActuallySpaceMan42
ActuallySpaceMan42
MinecraftHater2011
Amazingly PeakPeak (Bulk vs. Jumbo Josh; FINISHED)
Replies
27
Views
4K
Oiguana2701
Oiguana2701
Deadguy999
About mushroom cloud
Replies
0
Views
347
Deadguy999
Deadguy999
Back
Top