- 8,400
- 1,762
Continuing from this thread along with additional topics (https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/3401122). This thread is to detail some things:
Reevaluation 4-B's downgrade and the potential for it to retur:
If the calc is reevaluated it'd affect the majority of the tier 4's who explicitly scale to Celestia and upward. It'd also affect the scaling chain of those who scale such to those as Starswirl, who'd scale to about 1/5th to 1/6th of Celestia via how the magic was used to do the exact same feat Celestia did.
- Reevaluating the reason 4-B was rejected and it's potential flaws
- Highlighting the tiering of Starswirl and those who Upscale
Reevaluation 4-B's downgrade and the potential for it to retur:
- The reason for 4-B (these calcs here:https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/U...Pony:_Princess_Sun_Butt_moves_the_sun_(again) , https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Darkanine/My_Little_Pony:_Celestia_lifts_the_sun)being downgraded was essentially because of the fact the Sun moves inconsistently in comparison, we can't calc it because of it's speed differences . It was also downgraded because it was so close to FTL
- This is a weird reasoning to me for a few reasons:.
- One being a calc moderator [Numbersguy before he was got demoted] described the feat that was >.95 and said as long as it wasn't FTL it could be used.
- Two because this is implying any of the calcs have differences in the effort of the feat done. None of the feats were considered the ceiling as everytime the sun was moved it was an extremely casual effort. If Celestia does it stronger and faster with the same ease it stands to no reason those shown to be comparable can do the same.
- Three : Inconsistency in speed in the calcs would be a major problem if any of these were the limits of Celestia's powers... But it seems to be the opposite. Her doing it at different speeds is justified under the premise they all share a similar feat.
- Four: We treat casualness with doing very similar feats as leaning towards the higher ends than the lower end.... This should be treated similarly as none of the feats have a significant ceiling of moving the sun for them, so they do the same level of casualness per calc, hence this being possible to be discussed.
- Five: All the feats calced so far of moving the sun involving Celestia and Luna have been 4-B and or above .15c throughout various iterations of , which makes this even more possible as we have no anti-sun feat to use.
If the calc is reevaluated it'd affect the majority of the tier 4's who explicitly scale to Celestia and upward. It'd also affect the scaling chain of those who scale such to those as Starswirl, who'd scale to about 1/5th to 1/6th of Celestia via how the magic was used to do the exact same feat Celestia did.