Bleach speed light dodging calculation

Hello.

There is a new calculation blog for a Bleach light dodging feat that has caused quite a lot of drama:

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Bluetrekking/Bleach:_Light_Dodging_Calcs

The real cal howard and Thebluedash agree with the feat, and Kepekley23 disagrees with it.

Here is an image that describes the feat as a beam of light:



Here is the page that describes our standards for this sort of situation: Laser/Light Beam Dodging Feats

I would also appreciate if the calc group members focus on reading the arguments for and against within the blog comments, and ignore the drama.

It is also probably best if Knightofannihilation666 and Matthew stay out of this thread and let the calc group members discuss the already brought up arguments, as we would likely get more drama otherwise.

I would appreciate if somebody invites all of the current calc group members to participate here, as I have limited time available.

I have not read through the thread original calculation threads discussion. However i have looked at the calc and on our rules regarding light.

And in my opinion this feat does not qualify. The origin is unspecified. The beam of supposed light got shot out of a hole in the air. It is not a "realistic source" of light.

The light as well is not stated to be made out of particles resembling light.

Nor is it called "light-speed".

In addition the light does not reflect in any way.

All the things i mentioned are criterias for us to determine whether or not something can be considered proper light. The feat in question does not qualify for even one of those criterias.

We also have to take into account that, even if the pure technical aspect of one or maybe two criteria was met (being called light-speed for example) this automaticaly does not make the feat legit (The Hakuba incident for Naruto is a good example). But in this specific case there is absolutely nothing implied in that regard.

If we were to accept and use a calculation and feat based upon the mere appearance of the word "Light" it would create a dangerous precedent for other verses.

Also: Correct me if I am wrong, but in the feat no one even mentioned "Light", havent they? Not Light-speed or any other thing, sure. But not even the word "light".

I am not informed about the feat itself. I just tried to defuse the drama situation that was developing.

Thank you for the evaluation, and I agree about that we have to watch out for setting bad precedents.

Calc also needs to be fixed.

I agree with Raven, even if the calc was right (haven't checked it), we definitely cannot assume Negacion moves at the speed of light when nothing suggests so.

Okay. Thank you for the input.

I stated this in another thread:

I also heavily disagree with it being light-speed. There is nothing to indicate that it is actually true light and speed of light.

Yes, the calculation has been rejected.

I agree with RavenSupreme, Kepekley, and Soldier Blue as well.