surtur(Marvel Cinematic Universe) downgrade

Six_fold_god

194

15

• Feb 16, 2018

• #1

If 885 pixels in this scene is 96 km





the 8-kilometer-long asgard must appear 12 times smaller than this scene


However, as a result of playing 0.25 times the scene in which Surtur crushed the Asgard, the Asgard did not appear so small


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdqlSdSORl8

 

Assaltwaffle

VS Battles

Retired

8,438

3,293

• Feb 16, 2018

• #2

I'm on mobile right now but I'll take a deeper look into this if you remind me in a couple hours.

 

Six_fold_god

194

15

• Feb 17, 2018

• Thread starter
• #3

Code:

Thank you!

 

Assaltwaffle

VS Battles

Retired

8,438

3,293

• Feb 17, 2018

• #4

Yep. You're 100% correct.

It looks like there was an error in the original calculation's math. The big "whoops" moment happens here.

885 divided into 135 is not 68.07, it is 6.556. So this will be an entire magnitude downgrade.

6.556*1414.356 = 9272.518 meters.

Also the timeframe is REALLY highballed. While some debris does make it offscreen in 0.25 seconds, the majority of the destroyed Asgard doesn't get there for a little bit longer.

2:49.98-2:50.67 = 0.69 seconds

Speed: 13438.432 m/s

Argard: 2.7551033x10^13 kg found mass

KE: 0.5*(2.7551033×10^13)*13438.432^2 = 2.4877406x10^21 joules, or 594.584 Gigatons of TNT, High 6-C, Large Island level+

Ouch

 

Therefir

VS Battles

Content Moderator

Calculation Group

9,640

8,695

• Feb 17, 2018

• #5

Consistent with Hela.

 

Six_fold_god

194

15

• Feb 17, 2018

• Thread starter
• #6

Thank you for your quick response and processing.

 

Assaltwaffle

VS Battles

Retired

8,438

3,293

• Feb 17, 2018

• #7

Six fold god said:

Thank you for your quick response and processing.

Click to expand...

No problem. I will make a calc group thread for this shortly.

 

Assaltwaffle

VS Battles

Retired

8,438

3,293

• Feb 17, 2018

• #8

New thread here.