- 581
- 16
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Low sub-relativistic Naruto
- Thread starter UncleSpaceman
- Start date
- Status
- 330
- 17
I wish I could open this where I am, but no.
Naruto should remain where he is.
Naruto should remain where he is.
- 10,077
- 9,397
It wasn't accepted
- 330
- 17
^ that sorts that.
- 581
- 16
- Thread starter
- #5
It's been updated with angsizing though
- 330
- 17
Is anyone still discussing it?
- 581
- 16
- Thread starter
- #7
I think it wasn't accepted because it was originally mach 100,000+, with the update, it's mach 22,708. Naruto is currently mach 10,000+
- 330
- 17
Naruto is current Mach 3000+
That's too high and a outlier really. Recent calcs all but Naruto around the Mach 1700-3000 range.
That's too high and a outlier really. Recent calcs all but Naruto around the Mach 1700-3000 range.
- 12,659
- 2,434
How much is 1% of LS
- 330
- 17
Like, about Mach 8000-8500
- 12,659
- 2,434
Nvm I think this only low sub-relativistic or sub-relativistic base on the calc if it is accepted
- 12,659
- 2,434
@Quincy Emperor thx for tell me though it is clearer than the internet's explaination lol
- 2,870
- 73
Wasn't accepted I'm trying to recalculate it.
- 576
- 17
it won't be accepted due to abuse of cinematic time, which can't be used in a calc...
- 311
- 10
LMAO the streeeeetch!!!!
This is rubberband man. That should be a new slang word; rubber-band: a stretch that is just too much...
This is rubberband man. That should be a new slang word; rubber-band: a stretch that is just too much...
- 2,870
- 73
Lol I like how the feat was claimed an outlier to downplay while it was one year after the main storyline though....
- 955
- 50
Seems legit they're already at the top of the Massively Hypersonic Scale, Naruto being Low Sub-Rel definitely doesnt seem out of the question it's just he had time to react to it and he has Pre-Cog capabilities, Obviously not an "Outlier" since they just kept getting stronger & wiser as time progresses, Naruto just got "Rusty" not any weaker he just had to shake the dust off of his techniques and such if he is Sub-Rel here then in his Prime he should be as well
- 91
- 0
I have multiple calculations that should put God Tiers in Naruto at Sub Relativistic to Sub Relativistic+. https://plus.google.com/+MrSuperSaiyanGod/posts/LyH43xX4sRw https://plus.google.com/112659721014355096006/posts/LfQ5idFbCCM
Can they get an Upgrade?
Can they get an Upgrade?
- 3,077
- 121
Calc stacking and wank. They shouldn't get it.
- 91
- 0
It wasn't based on another calculation. So it can't be calculation stacking.
How is it Wank?, I'm using Science.
How is it Wank?, I'm using Science.
- 3,077
- 121
- 5,232
- 708
what mighty said.
- Status
Similar threads
