YouTube cartoons

[ZacharyGrossman273]

I've noticed that both the big lez show and eddsworld are allowed despite being YouTube cartoons. Does this mean YouTube cartoons are allowed if they have an actual story?

 

[Homu_Sweet_Homu]

I mean, we have RWBY, if that could be count as YT anime cartoon

 

[Theglassman12]

but RWBY is a rooster teeth owned series, which is released on their website first.

 

[Homu_Sweet_Homu]

Ah....

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

There's still stuff like https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Edd_(Eddsworld) and sassy the Sasquatch

 

[Theglassman12]

@Zach but what if they're actually from a different website that just posted the episodes in youtube?????

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

I looked it up, and eddsworld is but the big lez show originated on YouTube.

 

[JustSomeWeirdo]

Actually, Eddsworld originated on Newgrounds, pretty sure it doesn't really change anything though

 

[WeeklyBattles]

If they have a big enough following i think they should be fine, but thats iust my opinion. Honestly we maybe could have some evaluation process or somethingbfor stuff that originates on Youtube because infeel like we're a bit strict on youtube series.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

I think a specific clarification in the rules for what is allowed from youtube would actually be convinient, though I obviously can't decide what it is.

 

[JustSomeWeirdo]

I agree that these kinds of series should be evaluated on a case by case basis, the whole "it originated on YouTube" shouldn't really mean anything, why should the original source of the material ban a series in the first place?

 

[Reppuzan]

I never saw a problem with stuff being submitted on YouTube.

If it has a notable following, a clear, coherent storyline, and quantifiable feats, there should be no problem.

The problem is when we try to make profiles for YouTube personalities like Terry Crews and AVGN.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

One last thing.

My implication from YHVH and The Authority is that profiles offensive to religions are allowed as long as they are from a fictional multiverse and not actual religions.

 

[JustSomeWeirdo]

Well, considering we do have Jesus Christ, for example, fictional versions of religious figures are entirely acceptable, as we treat them as a separate entity, but ripping from the religion itself is too controversial

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

Ah good. It's the God and Jeffery Cartoon I was specifically thinking.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

The rule is if there's a legit continuity with some legit feats and/or lore, then YouTube or other Internet series are aloud. If they exist for strait up memes and nothing else, then not aloud.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

It's comedy but it has actual characters and a storyline

 

[Antvasima]

If it has a notable following, a clear, coherent storyline, and quantifiable feats, there should be no problem.

This is my view as well.

 

[Super_Ascended_Sean_Pazdera]

I made a well made and accurate Dr. Octagonapus profile a while back and it got deleted. Smh lol