Yet Another Batch (Belker, Cyclope, and Earthsaker) CRT

[Tllmbrg]

Tllmbrg/SandboxBelker

vsbattles.fandom.com

P&A additions and general clean-up
Type 9 immortality was removed because in 2e only their gas form requires a +1 weapon to hit, which is likely like that due to intangibility

Tllmbrg/SandboxCyclop(D&D)

vsbattles.fandom.com

Clean-up, adding a key, changing LS

Tllmbrg/SandboxEarthshaker

vsbattles.fandom.com

Adding powers and general clean-up

 

[Mr. Bambu]

I'm more than a little impressed you took the time to work on Earthshaker. Good stuff.

The disintegrate spell traditionally can only affect a set area of material, so I dunno about mentioning it as a particular resistance- though I recognize that there are exceptions, such as the spell destroying the entirety of the Temple of the Gods. On another note for the Earthshaker: perhaps we ought to just remove its 7-C key, instead making it Low 7-B outright? We can still link the calc, it is a good supporting feat, but if it is already portrayed as being on-par with legendary dragons, I don't see much a point in presenting it by its own calc.

Belker looks fine, fair point on the Type 9 removal, you're most likely right on that'n.

You forgot to add the actual key to the Cyclops. Also the singular form is Cyclops, multiple is Cyclopes, I am having conniptions at the word "Cyclop".

 

[Tllmbrg]

The disintegrate spell traditionally can only affect a set area of material, so I dunno about mentioning it as a particular resistance- though I recognize that there are exceptions, such as the spell destroying the entirety of the Temple of the Gods. On another note for the Earthshaker: perhaps we ought to just remove its 7-C key, instead making it Low 7-B outright? We can still link the calc, it is a good supporting feat, but if it is already portrayed as being on-par with legendary dragons, I don't see much a point in presenting it by its own calc.

Idc either way, the only thing about its overall stats they mention is that if it steps on anyone they're like uber dead
Thing doesn't have set levels nor do you ever fight it directly, so it being outright Low 7-B or even 6-C works

As for Disintegrate, from the way it is phrased I assume they were thinking of bigger AoE ones being used against the thing aye

You forgot to add the actual key to the Cyclops. Also the singular form is Cyclops, multiple is Cyclopes, I am having conniptions at the word "Cyclop".

I ******* hate English

 

[Mr. Bambu]

My vote is for just outright Low 7-B and using its 7-C feat as a support feat. I'll accept the Disintegrate thing.

 

[Tllmbrg]

Edited to that

 

[Tllmbrg]

CRT applied, thread can be closed

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Probably woulda waited on Qawsed for this one, since Earthshaker was his profile. Will wait to close it.