would this be Acausality type 1

[sukuna171]

Spoiler

So, we're paracausal, right? Effect and cause all shaken up, no connection. Everything else is connected forward and back through time. Tug on the butterfly here and make a cyclone there.

As far as I can tell this thing made itself. Spontaneous acausal generation. My best guess is that there's so much will hanging around that it crystallized. Pure I-am-and-I-gotta. Embodied stubbornness.

 

[PHANtomFELdway]

Seems type 5 since it's said to be disconnected from cause and effect, and time, and literally called "Acausal" in context to that.

Normally, we only have types of acausalities in scaling, so in actual philosophies and novels, the term Acausal would normally be for our type 5.

 

[Grabbing_dragon]

Seems type 5 since it's said to be disconnected from cause and effect, and time, and literally called "Acausal" in context to that.

Normally, we only have types of acausalities in scaling, so in actual philosophies and novels, the term Acausal would normally be for our type 5.

Nope, this will still be acausality type 1 and 4, since acausality type 5 isn't about being disconnected and outside cause and effect, but being unchangeable by all cause and effect.

 

[sukuna171]

Seems type 5 since it's said to be disconnected from cause and effect, and time, and literally called "Acausal" in context to that.

Normally, we only have types of acausalities in scaling, so in actual philosophies and novels, the term Acausal would normally be for our type 5.

The only beings with Type 5 Acausality are the Gardener and the Winnower. I was wondering if the Guardian has Acausal Type 1."

 

[PHANtomFELdway]

Nope, this will still be acausality type 1 and 4, since acausality type 5 isn't about being disconnected and outside cause and effect, but being unchangeable by all cause and effect.

Which being outside of cause and effect would apply to. It’s acasual to the notion of cause and affect which should just straight up be ac5

 

[PHANtomFELdway]

The only beings with Type 5 Acausality are the Gardener and the Winnower. I was wondering if the Guardian has Acausal Type 1."

Yeah ac1 is fine . Tho is the second sentence talking about them in question?

Cause it has no connection to causality and is self made.

 

[sukuna171]

Yeah ac1 is fine . Tho is the second sentence talking about them in question?

Cause it has no connection to causality and is self made.

The we're paracausal part was referring to the Guardians

 

[PHANtomFELdway]

The we're paracausal part was referring to the Guardians

I was referring to this

As far as I can tell this thing made itself. Spontaneous acausal generation. My best guess is that there's so much will hanging around that it crystallized. Pure I-am-and-I-gotta. Embodied stubbornness.

 

[sukuna171]

I was referring to this

As far as I can tell this thing made itself. Spontaneous acausal generation. My best guess is that there's so much will hanging around that it crystallized. Pure I-am-and-I-gotta. Embodied stubbornness.

oh, its referring to the finality's-auger it's a gun

Finality's Auger — Lore Entry — Ishtar Collective — Destiny Lore by subject

Write the future into the present. — ACCESS: RESTRICTED DECRYPTION KEY: 6DU3H2BSKP1V$CHA-319 REP#: 177-PYR-WPN AGENT(S): TRU-135 SUBJ: THIS BENIGHTED THING

www.ishtar-collective.net