Wow, Matthew, this is new levels of Toxic, not even allowing any explainations, lovely. But allow me to show you that what you put was wrong:
>First up why is God listed as female? The text repeatedly uses male pronouns
Days of Fire specifically calls God she, she is never called anything else throughout the entire book. The Picture on her profile is her. God is a she.
>Quantum Manipulation, Immortality (Type 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8) and Mid-Godly have no justifications
Quantum Manipulation:
https://i.imgur.com/Sg27dK3.png https://imgur.com/Bhj5JX0 https://imgur.com/nygRUca
Type 1, 2 and 3 are basic and I assume you understand that God would have these, I hope you have the common sense for it.
Type 4, You're right, Type 4 should't be on there.
Type 5,
Angels are Deathless beings,
Angels are just fragments of God.
Type 8, God is one with Creation to destroy God, one must destroy Creation. Creation is literally made upon God.
Mid-Godly: Already went over in this thread
here .
>Type 5 Acausality has no backing
Went over this
here .
>Type 1 Abstract Existence has really lackluster justifications, and Type 2 Conceptual Manipulation has no justification at all
Angels created all Concepts in reality, Angels are just fragments of God.
Here's God creating the Concept of Death directly.
>Gives Type 9/10 Large Size based on God being called an "infinite existence"
Everything is created on God,
God is stated to be all creation etc.
>"Immortality and Regenerationn negation (Mid-Godly and Type 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8)" and Resistance Negation, all absurdly high-end powers with no justifications
Again, I hope you have the common sense to understand that 1, 2 and 3 would be a given for the Angels and Demons.
Type 4 is being able to completely ignore
this .
Type 5, God has killed Type 5s, additionally, the Angels do this, as they are able to inflict Death upon the Demons. This is shown over the Age of Astrosities.
Type 7, Undead, God can ignore Undeath of
Liches, from Archmage. And naturally Caine and his Vampires. After all, he gave Caine his Undeath.
Type 8, same thing, she can neg Liches.
>Data Manipulation comes from absolutely nothing. Seriously, the scan says nothing about it
Went through this in this
thead...again.
>Resisting Time, Soul and Spatial Manipulation by existing before these elements, time for all creator gods to resist ALL powers
I'm not sure what you're trying to put here? But God is also immune to the attempts at harming him from the Archmages, who can do all of the above.
>Resisting various other powers from entities "infinite infinities" (See below) weaker really doesn't count for anything
Actually, we've consider that more so just Infinitely above instead of Infinite infinities, as it seems much more like the former and the latter being flowery talk for the former.
>Planck Length Matter Manipulation doesn't mention planck... or matter... or even God
See above.
>The Avatars key seems superfluous because nothing in the scan mentions avatars
This was one of the things I was going to cover in a Respect thread I was going to make when I had the time, because it is constantly stated that in Days of Fire that God's infinity cannot touch Finite,
this is also backed up by the statement that God is too powerful to even create Creation and has to use the smallest fragments of his power to create the Angels.
>The 6 dimensions thing is both listed twice for different justifications for the same tier, and really just seems like technobabble
I'm not even sure what you're trying to prove with this?
If you want more, there's Atlantis which is stated to have be in Several metaphysical dimensions, low-balling to 3 (Several meaning more than 2) then Atlantis exist in 6 dimensions.
>The "infinite infinities above angels" thing is utter nonsense, it's only that the Angels call God the "Infinite of Infinities" as a title
Wait, why did you use this as justifications for him not to have powers but then say that the statement shouldn't be used? That's very depicidous. And see above.
>Infinite multiverses are never mentioned, and the infinite Heavens is explicitly just theoretical
See my comments above this one.
>A single mention of quantum physics does not warrant the "possibly far higher", and the "may contain many more dimensions" bit only mentions four dimensions
See above.