- 6,826
- 7,174
Title
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Why the spacetime of a place that isn't universe sized doesn't qualify for Low 2-C?
- Thread starter Accelerated_Evolution
- Start date
- 6,826
- 7,174
- Thread starter
- #6
- 8,828
- 9,403
Keep the brood down where they belong.
- 11,640
- 10,884
The actual answer is that it's simply the standard the wiki has in place.
If I was to guess why, it would be to avoid outliers that come from smaller space-times.
- 6,456
- 1,670
It really depends on context. Like things can be spatially seprates by still exist in the same 3rd dimensional space and share the same 4th dimension of time. Thus, its like ya know the funny saying "room level." LOL
Though, it's a wholly and completely separate space and time that exist "outside the living "living universe
""
But still room sized...
Then it becomes complicated.............
Though, it's a wholly and completely separate space and time that exist "outside the living "living universe
""
But still room sized...
Then it becomes complicated.............
- 32,835
- 38,109
Yeah well, that might change in the future.
That would actually be incorrect. Outliers were never even a topic of discussion to begin with, nor are they a convincing matter due to how dimensions work, but again, it might be changed in the future. Tier 2 is due for an overhaul.
Or you know, the room is 1mm short of being the full 93.016 billion light-years diameter. It wouldn't be Low 2-C then, just for that 1mm.
- 6,456
- 1,670
I was speaking on specifics.
I thought by standards if there is enough implications of such immense size to suggest that and then it'd stated to have its own time. It's Low 2-C? That's how I interpreted the page at least.
Key phrasing there I'd "implications." Instead of explicit stuff
- 17,416
- 12,907
1mm probably gets covered by margin of error tbf
- 32,835
- 38,109
That might change sooner or later. But first we gotta deal with the upcoming Transduality overhaul revisions and Marvel Cosmology + Magics revisions. When do those come out? Your guess is as good as mine.
As hilarious as it sounds, nah. It doesn't, from what I've seen.
But it might not matter for long.
Last edited:
- 9,982
- 10,821
Not 100% maths based standard is the only answer to it.
- 5,360
- 6,124
its just arbitrary
- 12,191
- 6,132
What is HST?
Dimension of Strange Swirling Lights It also has spacetime quotes, but I doubt it will be accepted as 2-C someday.
- 12,191
- 6,132
I highly doubt that the time room is the size of the Earth, although there are several of them spread across the Universe.
Although in some novels it is mentioned that it is infinite in the Dragon Ball Z novel
- 6,826
- 7,174
- Thread starter
- #19
- 12,191
- 6,132
Hyperbolic, it would be cooler to say time room.
Really
- 6,826
- 7,174
- Thread starter
- #21
It is also called "The Room of Spirit and Time"
- 1,284
- 540
Although on the other hand, that would make anyone who can manipulate time and space Low 2-C.
- 6,826
- 7,174
- Thread starter
- #23
You are manipulating a 4D structure, not destroying it, this just makes your hax have Low 2-C rangeAlthough on the other hand, that would make anyone who can manipulate time and space Low 2-C.
- 1,284
- 540
- 6,826
- 7,174
- Thread starter
- #25
Interesting, but i think it still would depend on how the space-time manipulation feat occurred
- 5,281
- 4,173
I asked this question a long time ago. I asked why the space-time has to be the size of the observable universe, what if it's half the size of the observable universe?
The answer was, that it's an arbitrary rule and the situation that I mentioned was unlikely to come up.
The answer was, that it's an arbitrary rule and the situation that I mentioned was unlikely to come up.
- 6,826
- 7,174
- Thread starter
- #27
- 32,835
- 38,109
- 6,826
- 7,174
- Thread starter
- #29
LMAO, i readed it as "HTC"
- 5,603
- 3,614
Mostly range. In most cases these small spacetime exist within a bigger universe which implies that it is far smaller than a snapshot of a single universe.
In all sense due to how common to portray it like that. For a small dimension spacetime to qualify for low 2-C it would need to fall into a proper requirement which mostly arbitrary requires it to be universal in size to align with how we rate a single spacetime universe.
You can prove a small dimension with spacetime to be low 2-C but the story or verse have to answer contradiction and paradox It present by presenting it to be like that. Which most of the time they do not making us assume a minimal rating which would be the size of the dimension on itself.
Furthermore some small dimension with spacetime sometimes are only because of immersion but in actually they are just paintings, books, image, etc in the real world.
In all sense due to how common to portray it like that. For a small dimension spacetime to qualify for low 2-C it would need to fall into a proper requirement which mostly arbitrary requires it to be universal in size to align with how we rate a single spacetime universe.
You can prove a small dimension with spacetime to be low 2-C but the story or verse have to answer contradiction and paradox It present by presenting it to be like that. Which most of the time they do not making us assume a minimal rating which would be the size of the dimension on itself.
Furthermore some small dimension with spacetime sometimes are only because of immersion but in actually they are just paintings, books, image, etc in the real world.
- 9,577
- 10,953
It don't matta, nonna dis does.
- 1,667
- 1,294
Another question; Time is treated as infinite by default right? Should the size of a space with its own unique and specific time dimension matter when the time that services it extends infinitely across?,
- 5,603
- 3,614
I live in the present not in the future. The bridge will be crossed when we get to that bridge
Tanin_iver
He/Him- 605
- 637
It doesn't afaik. All baseline Low 2-C feats are equal, because time extends infinitely, irrespective of the spatial size of the universe.
Similar threads
