Why isn’t there a Supercluster level?

[TugiaTheNarrator]

I feel like Multi-Galaxy level is too big

Things like Galaxy Groups, Galaxy Superclusters, and Galaxy Filaments should be included too

 

[JPTheGamer]

Because those are basically comprised of multiple galaxies. What's the point in having a "supercluster" level if it's just a group of galaxies and you already have a tier for destroying or creating more than one galaxy?

 

[TugiaTheNarrator]

Because those are basically comprised of multiple galaxies. What's the point in having a "supercluster" level if it's just a group of galaxies and you already have a tier for destroying or creating more than one galaxy?

Galaxies are comprised of multiple solar systems. What’s the point in having a “galaxy” level if it’s just a group of solar systems and you already have a tier for destroying or creating more than one solar system?

 

[JPTheGamer]

Galaxies are comprised of multiple solar systems. What’s the point in having a “galaxy” level if it’s just a group of solar systems and you already have a tier for destroying or creating more than one solar system?

The tier exists not just because it's “comprised of multiple solar systems,” but because it marks a higher magnitude of power—quantitatively and qualitatively different from merely destroying a few solar systems. Destroying one galaxy and destroying thousands of galaxies are orders of magnitude different in energy, scope, and feat significance. Each tier is meant to quantify escalating power in a structured and meaningful way.

 

[TugiaTheNarrator]

The tier exists not just because it's “comprised of multiple solar systems,” but because it marks a higher magnitude of power—quantitatively and qualitatively different from merely destroying a few solar systems. Destroying one galaxy and destroying thousands of galaxies are orders of magnitude different in energy, scope, and feat significance. Each tier is meant to quantify escalating power in a structured and meaningful way.

but the thing is, destroying 2 galaxies and destroying a whole supercluster are different magnitudes of energy as well

 

[JPTheGamer]

but the thing is, destroying 2 galaxies and destroying a whole supercluster are different magnitudes of energy as well

A supercluster can, at the very least, contain two galaxies in fiction. VS Battles Wiki doesn't have a "Supercluster level" because it's already included under 3-B (Multi-Galaxy level); the increase in scale doesn’t represent a new category of power like universal or multiversal destruction does. If they made a new tier for every possible grouping (e.g., galaxy group, cluster, supercluster), the system would be too bloated with negligible differences in actual cosmological impact compared to what’s categorized.

 

[Frey_Starlight]

because super clustors like our local group which is part of Laniakea Superclust are already covered in multi-galaxy lvl. so there isn't a reason to put that. what you are saying about energy and different magnitudes is correct but most fictions which would reach this lvl of ap do so with multipliers and ap upscalings etc, hardly any fiction actually just destroys superclustors. also there might be some back end thinking of when the tier was made about if there are even enough characters to justify the criteria for a new lets say 3-B+ (varient tier name) if they can all still be chalked to multi-galaxy, since by the name defination, it would encompass quite literally everything bellow observable universe scale.