- 7,625
- 8,321
Don't know how to gauge this.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Where would this fall in Striking Strength?
- Thread starter ActuallySpaceMan42
- Start date
- 7,625
- 8,321
- Thread starter
- #2
Damn, does no one know?
Rikimarox2
He/Him- 9,164
- 5,459
I mean, we can't really measure it in any way besides either calculating the feat or just taking the highest number it gave, even if it states it cannot be "measured", as we really don't have any other way to measure it.
If you have some numbers like how diameter, and depth of the circle made, you could calculate it or request a calculation, or if there were more proof that it shook the entire seawater of the location (if it was an ocean for example, and there was proof it shook all of it), you calculate that as well.
If you have some numbers like how diameter, and depth of the circle made, you could calculate it or request a calculation, or if there were more proof that it shook the entire seawater of the location (if it was an ocean for example, and there was proof it shook all of it), you calculate that as well.
- 7,625
- 8,321
- Thread starter
- #4
Hmm, yeah, I suppose those are my only options.
I was thinking, since it transcended the destructive force of matter, maybe it was saying it was Durability Negation, or Matter Manipulation.
- 35,092
- 41,704
You need the displacement (I.e. the amount of distance the force travelled after being inflicted) to get energy out of it.
So you need to convert the mass value to newtons and multiply it with the displacement. Usually the default assumption is a foot, or .3048 meters, in accordance with ft-lbs of energy.
So you need to convert the mass value to newtons and multiply it with the displacement. Usually the default assumption is a foot, or .3048 meters, in accordance with ft-lbs of energy.
Rikimarox2
He/Him- 9,164
- 5,459
Honestly? With this scan alone, I think you could argue for "Likely Durability Negation". I don't think Matter Manip has that much justification, but dura neg seems plausible.
Similar threads
