- 664
- 371
Where would a interdimensional structure (interdimensional to a multiverse) scale to?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Where would an Interdimensional scale to?
- Thread starter Lloydblitzed
- Start date
- 664
- 371
- Thread starter
- #3
For more context: The interdimensional structure is located between all the universes of the multiverse, acts are a seperator to them and also allows people to travel to other universes (Low 2-C sized btw) by passing into the interdimensional structure in question
Last edited:
- 664
- 371
- Thread starter
- #4
So with this in mind, where would it scale
- 19,288
- 9,742
sounds unquantifiable to me
- 664
- 371
- Thread starter
- #6
Alright ty
- 664
- 371
- Thread starter
- #7
Also, would a structure inacessible to the mortals qualify for Higher Dimensional Existance or nah
- 3,164
- 7,807
Interdimensional is simply ranging from one dimension to another. Heck, I can even have an interdimensional range by uploading data from a USB onto my computer lol.
- 4,093
- 4,812
????????????
Breaking news. Mankind has found out how to create a separate dimensional space.
- 3,164
- 7,807
Prove me wrong.
- 4,093
- 4,812
I'm sorry. I have been mistaken and you are objectively correct.
