• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Where does 0=1 axiom scales?

Since it is an contradiction which is of no value, like absolute infinity as proved by Russell paladox. however, it works well with Trivialism to make all statements true.
 
I think it's funny how many SRE supporters said SRE scales to rank into rank but now Lewis linked this thread to "disprove" 0=1 scaling for SCP.
 
Let me get this shit straight

If PA + ~Con(PA) |- 0 = 1, that would constitute a proof by contradiction for PA |- Con(PA). But no such proof can exist due to the second incompleteness theorem. So PA + ~Con(PA) |-

0 = 1 will simply become false.

Set theory worshipers (in powerscaling community) is the bastion of pseudo intellectual dog shit
 
Let me get this shit straight

If PA + ~Con(PA) |- 0 = 1, that would constitute a proof by contradiction for PA |- Con(PA). But no such proof can exist due to the second incompleteness theorem. So PA + ~Con(PA) |-

0 = 1 will simply become false.

Set theory worshipers (in powerscaling community) is the bastion of pseudo intellectual dog shit
Calm down bro , LMAO
 
Back
Top