What type of fallacy would this be?

[Read_this_post]

So if i were to have a debate about pennywise being universal plus, and somebody without any other proof came along and said "pennywise cant have infinite power, he is just a big stupid clown", what type of fallacy would this be? Would this fall under genetic or ad hominem? Or perhaps something else?

 

[IvoryAS]

More just sounds like lack of proof, so a Casual fallacy.

 

[DMB_1]

Generic downplay.

 

[Read_this_post]

More just sounds like lack of proof, so a Casual fallacy.

You mean like a false cause or causal fallacy? I dont think casual fallacy is a thing.

 

[Tony_di_bugalu]

Generic downplay.

This.

 

[Read_this_post]

Even though that is true, i dont think it counts as a fallacy. Plus it would still be fallacious even if it wasnt downplay lol.

 

[Kaltias]

It's an argument from incredulity

 

[Read_this_post]

I see. Thank you very much. You can close this now if you need to.