What tier is this?

[Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara]

Imagine a structure of universal (low 2-C) size. Within that structure, there are numerous other structures of an identical nature and tier. Those structures contain their own set of identical structures, repeating infinitely. All of these structures exist within a single, larger structure that is also its own timeline. Is this 2-A for everything, low 1-C for the latter structure, or high 1-B/low 1-A?

 

[Shiroiyo]

If I am not mistaken, without further context Infinity +/x Infinity is 2-A. With R>F and the like it can be higher. I am no expert in tier 1 and I could be wrong tho.

 

[Galaxi789]

Imagine una estructura de tamaño universal (bajo 2-C). Dentro de esa estructura, hay muchas otras estructuras de naturaleza y nivel idénticos. Esas estructuras contienen su propio conjunto de estructuras idénticas, que se repiten infinitamente. Todas estas estructuras existen dentro de una sola estructura más grande que también es su propia línea de tiempo. ¿Es este 2-A para todo, 1-C bajo para la última estructura o 1-B alto/1-A bajo?

sounds low 1c potentially higher there is more context

 

[Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara]

There is more context, but this is all I needed to know for right now. Thanks.

 

[Galaxi789]

There is more context, but this is all I needed to know for right now. Thanks.

it's from a game

 

[Makoto500]

Higher into 2-A unless if there is more context.

 

[ShadowWarrior1999]

Wait, so a Low 2-C structure that contains an infinite number of Low 2-C structures within it? Like they’re pocket realities?

 

[Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara]

Wait, so a Low 2-C structure that contains an infinite number of Low 2-C structures within it? Like they’re pocket realities?

Yes. I was under the impression that this would be low 1-C, since a single low 2-C structure would be infinitesimally small in comparison.

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

Why would that be infinitesimal?

 

[ShadowWarrior1999]

Yes. I was under the impression that this would be low 1-C, since a single low 2-C structure would be infinitesimally small in comparison.

If it was Low 1-C then the initial structure in question wouldn’t be Low 2-C. But if this is just some kind of pocket reality deal then it’s 2-A.

 

[Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara]

Why would that be infinitesimal?

If there are infinitely many objects in an area, wouldn't a single object be only an infinitesimal fraction of the area itself?

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

If there are infinitely many objects in an area, wouldn't a single object be only an infinitesimal fraction of the area itself?

You would need uncountable infinite objects. Only then it would be infinitesimal.

 

[Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara]

Hm, alright. Good to know it's 2-A at minimum.

 

[Makoto500]

Hm, alright. Good to know it's 2-A at minimum.

2-A Is the best it can go, unless if there are more context out there.

 

[Achille]

Imagine a structure of universal (low 2-C) size. Within that structure, there are numerous other structures of an identical nature and tier. Those structures contain their own set of identical structures, repeating infinitely. All of these structures exist within a single, larger structure that is also its own timeline. Is this 2-A for everything, low 1-C for the latter structure, or high 1-B/low 1-A?

According to the context you gave it should be 2-A in certain scope.
I think that having an infinite number of these Universal structures and each having a repeating timeline (a single timeline that covers them all) can give Low 1-C.

And the distance between two timelines is defined as the 5th dimension (Or a 4th spatial dimension) that separates two or more universes.