-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
What tier is destroying accidentelly a city in a unespecified amount of time?
- Thread starter Livinmeme
- Start date
- 9,779
- 3,541
It varies.
Accidentally? Through what means?
Destroyed to what extent? Do any of the building structures remain? If they're gone, is the ground flat, or is there a crater, as if even some of the earth the stood on was destroyed?
Not to mention, even ignoring what PORTION of the material was destroyed, the destruction method matters, too.
Fragmenting, violently fragmenting, pulverizing, vaporizing or atomizing the same amount of material can get different results.
As for timeframe, it's unspecified, so you kind of need to assume a time, or at least a range. Our yields for feats are usually measures of the energy output of the feat per second. It's why we divide results by the timeframe if they take more than 1 second.
So what assumptions or knowledge can be provided about the timeframe for the destruction? How was the event described or depicted?
Accidentally? Through what means?
Destroyed to what extent? Do any of the building structures remain? If they're gone, is the ground flat, or is there a crater, as if even some of the earth the stood on was destroyed?
Not to mention, even ignoring what PORTION of the material was destroyed, the destruction method matters, too.
Fragmenting, violently fragmenting, pulverizing, vaporizing or atomizing the same amount of material can get different results.
As for timeframe, it's unspecified, so you kind of need to assume a time, or at least a range. Our yields for feats are usually measures of the energy output of the feat per second. It's why we divide results by the timeframe if they take more than 1 second.
So what assumptions or knowledge can be provided about the timeframe for the destruction? How was the event described or depicted?
- 8,605
- 4,064
- Thread starter
- #3
that they destroyed the city in a figth for example and i am refering buldings on fire or barelly standing that type of things
- 9,779
- 3,541
If it's hypothetical, it's much more difficult to tier. Also, simply having something be on fire usually doesn't get higher than 9-B.
If the buildings are barely standing, we need to know how much material was destroyed/damaged, & destroyed/damaged in what way.
What is it made of? What are the measurements of the destroyed material?
For a more general answer, as opposed to one based on calculating....
I think we have a Blog/Page somewhere that explains Tier Justifications, & the info for Town & City Level & such may provide insight into the answers you seek.
- 1,626
- 148
City level.
- 8,605
- 4,064
- Thread starter
- #6
thanks for being so specific man in fact your words are more viable that 100 pages of calculations
- 1,626
- 148
Unspecified time so no reason to assume it took forever
- 8,605
- 4,064
- Thread starter
- #8
yes but it wouldnt be city level because they take time to destroy the city
- 1,626
- 148
How do you know they take time
- 8,605
- 4,064
- Thread starter
- #10
because there is the time is not specified so logically they take some time the problem is that the time is unespecified
