Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It described as these:Perception Manipulation and potentially Logic Manipulation, depending on how 'Reason' is described.
And it can even erase the rationale that sustain one's entire existence.
You need explicit contradictions to happen for logic manip. Getting rid of rationale behind someones existence doesnt really qualify. It feels like logic manip has been slowly misunderstood and washed down over time from what DT originally proposed and got accepted.Then yeah this sounds like Logic Manipulation.
Well, is it always about contradictions? Sounds more like Paraconsistent instead, cmiiw. In this context though, it is rejecting the logical basis upon which that being is recognized by reality. In other words, reality itself no longer accepts that being as a valid existence because the governing principle of Reason has denied it.You need explicit contradictions to happen for logic manip. Getting rid of rationale behind someones existence doesnt really qualify. It feels like logic manip has been slowly misunderstood and washed down over time from what DT originally proposed and got accepted.
Yes you need to clearly violate the three laws of thought. Manipulating logic even as a governing force does not qualify. DT was very adamant about needing to clearly show logical contradictions being made rather than manipulating some force a verse calls logic.Well, is it always about contradictions? Sounds more like Paraconsistent instead, cmiiw. In this context though, it is rejecting the logical basis upon which that being is recognized by reality. In other words, reality itself no longer accepts that being as a valid existence because the governing principle of Reason has denied it.
Yes you need to clearly violate the three laws of thought. Manipulating logic even as a governing force does not qualify. DT was very adamant about needing to clearly show logical contradictions being made rather than manipulating some force a verse calls logic.
I don't know; they seem to match this part about deductive reasoning.You need explicit contradictions to happen for logic manip. Getting rid of rationale behind someones existence doesnt really qualify. It feels like logic manip has been slowly misunderstood and washed down over time from what DT originally proposed and got accepted.
Plus, one of the use cases for Logic Manipulation is Logic Deletion.Logic is defined in the real world as the study of correct reasoning. Translating this to fiction, manipulation of logic would essentially involve manipulating the rules governing deductive reasoning.
The ability has to be done through contradictions/work off logical contradictions.I don't know; they seem to match this part about deductive reasoning.
Plus, one of the use cases for Logic Manipulation is Logic Deletion.
So Logic Manipulation is less about actually manipulating Logic, and more about contradicting established Logic.The ability has to be done through contradictions/work off logical contradictions.
Also an example example of requiring contradictions
Yea its meant to be a lot stricter than other metaphysical aspects where you can simply just mention them to qualify.So Logic Manipulation is less about actually manipulating Logic, and more about contradicting established Logic.
That's odd.
Everyone thinks its odd but thats why only anos has it (idk any other verse that does)So Logic Manipulation is less about actually manipulating Logic, and more about contradicting established Logic.
That's odd.
Huh.Yea its meant to be a lot stricter than other metaphysical aspects where you can simply just mention them to qualify.
So I guess you could get AE, because they are talking about Logic, but not in the way that would garner Logic Manipulation.Well, is it always about contradictions? Sounds more like Paraconsistent instead, cmiiw. In this context though, it is rejecting the logical basis upon which that being is recognized by reality. In other words, reality itself no longer accepts that being as a valid existence because the governing principle of Reason has denied it.
YTSY does.Everyone thinks its odd but thats why only anos has it (idk any other verse that does)
its chinese ofc it doesYTSY does.
this doesEveryone thinks its odd but thats why only anos has it (idk any other verse that does)
AE? As in Abstract Existence?So I guess you could get AE, because they are talking about Logic, but not in the way that would garner Logic Manipulation.
Yes, you can have Logic/Reason based AE, since, as I said, this does seem to be logic, just not in the way of Logic Manipulation.AE? As in Abstract Existence?
You mean for the being whose rationale got erased, right? Is that Type 1 or 2Yes, you can have Logic/Reason based AE, since, as I said, this does seem to be logic, just not in the way of Logic Manipulation.
Having your rationale/logic erased would either be Resistance or Immunity to Logic Manipulation. But if any characters embody reason, or are those laws themselves they could gain AE.You mean for the being whose rationale got erased, right? Is that Type 1 or 2
Ahh, I get what you mean by AE, I thought you're referring to those whose rationale got erased.Having your rationale/logic erased would either be Resistance or Immunity to Logic Manipulation. But if any characters embody reason, or are those laws themselves they could gain AE.
If that the case, nomological concept just concept with weird law on it?The ability has to be done through contradictions/work off logical contradictions.
Also an example example of requiring contradictions