Value for cellular destruction?

[Expectro2000xxx]

There is a value to use in case of an attack that is stated to destroy something until not a fragment of cell remain? There is certain feat I want to calc that involve an attack with a statement like that, so want to confirm what destruction value should I use.

 

[Gilad_Hyperstar]

I think vaporization would be enough. Attacking in such way that a human will be vaporized will leave nothing solid left from them, not even their cells

 

[Expectro2000xxx]

I think vaporization would be enough. Attacking in such way that a human will be vaporized will leave nothing solid left from them, not even their cells

Is fine to use vaporization even if wasn't made with a fire/heat based attack? And if there is no vapor left? To give more context the attack in question was a mini black hole.

 

[Gilad_Hyperstar]

Fictional Black Holes are considered mostly hax rather than showings of AP, especially since in most cases they don't behave like actual black holes

 

[Expectro2000xxx]

Fictional Black Holes are considered mostly hax rather than showings of AP, especially since in most cases they don't behave like actual black holes

I know, but don't still they could be used to calculate feats? I just want to calculate in this specific case the ap of a character that using that attack destroyed around 508731249999.550049 cm3 of rock, initially I used the pulverization value of rock but later remembered the cell statement from a different scene (but using the same attack) and then I got the question if use another destruction value.

 

[Gilad_Hyperstar]

Honestly, it should depend on how it destroyed the stone

If there's chucks of rubble left, it's fragmentation. If it's reduced to dust or something, that's pulverization, and if there's only smoke remaining it's vaporization

Higher destruction values such as atomization and sub-atomization exist, but unless you can prove that the material was destroyed down to that level, you'll likely won't get it given it's very tough to prove it