• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Updating important pages

Skalt711

He/Him
VS Battles
Retired
2,463
928
They need your love and care. This list will be updated later on.

Outdated style:

  • Spite Thread
    1. Badly styled level.
    2. Unneeded <br \>.
    3. Outdated style of the list of examples.
  • Foe
    1. No levels (This is a weird style!).
    2. Outdated style of the list of examples.
    3. Unformatted numbers.
      For example, 10^47 should be described as 1047 (Code: 10<sup>47</sup>)).
  • Inconsistency
    1. First mention of word inconsistency should be bolded.
      The correct text should be this:
      In fiction, an inconsistency is when a character has an occurrence usually regarding power that differs from the norm.
    2. No level named as Description.
    3. Outdated style of the list of examples.
    4. See Also should be named as See also.
  • Hyperbole
    1. In "A Hyperbole is a term" Hyperbole shouldn't be capitalized.
    2. Outdated style of the list of examples.
  • CIS
    1. Unneeded symbols and spaces, no bolding in Short for "Character - Induced Stupidity".
      The correct text should be this:
      Short for Character-Induced Stupidity
    2. No levels (This is a weird style!).
    3. Outdated style of the list of examples.
  • FTL
    1. No levels (This is a weird style!).
    2. Unneeded commas in the first line
  • Statements
    1. No level named as Description.
    2. The caps in "A character CAN be upgraded" should be replaced by bolded text.
      The correct text should be this:
      A character ca be upgraded
    3. "statements" should be bolded in the "reliability of statements about characters"
      The correct text should be this:
      the reliability of statements about characters
 
I would appreciate if somebody in the staff could help out with this.
 
The most visible inappropriate thing in those pages is a lack of headings (This is what Skalt meant under "levels", I guess). I'm pretty sure that there're many other pages with an outdated style.
 
Back
Top