• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Unorthodox Kitten Discussion Thread

Okay I just discovered this verse, and I REALLY want to work on it. It looks absolutely bonkers, and as a Monument Mythos lover through and through I'm here for it.

I'll see if I can start going through the series soon, but with how many projects I have backed up idk how quickly I'll be able to work on anything (even though it can't be put on VSBW yet cause of the whole view thing). Keep me posted though please!
 
Rakih_Elyan said:
Peak analog series
Click to expand...
muscle-man-eating.gif

Me when the analog horror series has busted cosmic horros beyond my comprehension.
 
FriendOfTheTeaParty said:
I had a bunch of stuff for tier 0 and like 1-A+ and whatever but lost my scans and the guy likes to nuke all the descriptions and stuff for an ARG
Click to expand...
What is your justification for 1-A+? Even though you no longer have the scans, I would like to know your perspective. Of course, I have the scans, the documents, and so on, and I'd be happy to discuss it with you if you're interested.
 
FriendOfTheTeaParty said:
Sure. Just to warn the verse cant be on VSBW because a youtube verse needs 1 million views on 1 video but go ahead.
Click to expand...
We have the Natural World. It is defined as the entirety of what is considered to exist within systems of knowledge known as frameworks. In other words, it is not limited to physical reality, but also includes everything that can be described and interpreted through theories and models, along with their assumptions, premises, and underlying principles. The Natural World encompasses everything that a given system of knowledge accepts as "existing" in practice, even if it is merely a theoretical construct. In this sense, every entity exists within at least one such system of knowledge. However, it represents only the portion of reality that is accessible to us, filtered through our methods of observation and validation. Even so, throughout the documents, certain extreme events are described as being capable of weakening the validity or applicability of specific assumptions and laws. Under such circumstances, the fundamental structures that normally govern the Natural World can become unstable.

Home Homogeneous System (HHS)

The Natural World is the totality of observable and interpretable phenomena within the Home Homogeneous System (HHS). In this sense, the two coincide in practice: the Home Homogeneous System is the underlying structure, that is, the specific homogeneous system in which we exist, whereas the Natural World is the collection of contents that can be perceived, measured, and described within it. This relationship is established logically through the juxtaposition of their definitions. The Home Homogeneous System is the system in which explainable regions exist, that is, regions that are susceptible to observation, description, and interpretation. Consequently, the Natural World consists of the phenomena and entities that arise within these regions and can be meaningfully incorporated into systems of knowledge. In other words, the Natural World is precisely the set of entities regarded as existing within a given framework. These entities correspond to the explainable regions, since only what can, in principle, be explained or observed is considered to exist within the system. Thus, the Natural World corresponds exactly to the contents of the explainable regions of the Home Homogeneous System (HHS).

What is a Homogeneous System?

A Homogeneous System is an autonomous structure of governing laws and logical principles. It is a framework in which a specific set of rules and constants operates consistently, without internal contradictions. The totality of Existence (the Real System) is considered heterogeneous precisely because it encompasses countless independent Homogeneous Systems, each operating according to its own unique laws and fundamental principles. Although a Homogeneous System is internally coherent and uniform with respect to its governing structure, the Real System as a whole is not, as it is composed of multiple Homogeneous Systems that may differ fundamentally from one another in their logic, causality, or any other properties that govern them.

Homogeneous Systems should not be interpreted as separate universes. Rather, they are epistemological structures that remain mutually independent while operating within a single shared reality: the Real System, the heterogeneous reality formed by the interaction of all Homogeneous Systems. Nevertheless, Homogeneous Systems are perceived as physical by the meta-levels and by the entities that emerge within them. Although universes, multiverses, and similar structures do exist, they can be understood as a consequence of the way each system partitions and stabilizes reality according to its own structure. In other words, they are all local configurations of that reality.

Furthermore, a specific physical reality is generated by a specific Homogeneous System, functioning as a layer produced by that very system. Therefore, although, from an external perspective (that is, from a meta-level point of view), Homogeneous Systems can be understood as epistemological structures, a set of governing rules and principles, within themselves they constitute concrete physical reality itself.

Each Homogeneous System is epistemologically distinct from the others, as they do not share a fundamental language. When one is reconstructed based on the phenomena of a particular Homogeneous System, its original fundamental language is lost.

This is consistent with the author's statement that they drew inspiration from the MUH (Mathematical Universe Hypothesis), which is associated with the Type IV Multiverse. This interpretation is further supported by the work itself through the idea that messages adapt to the observer's perceptual capacity and by the existence of variations in substructural mathematical concepts throughout Existence. Despite this, the MUH, the Type IV Multiverse, and any mathematical structure would merely constitute local configurations or finite projections of a greater structure.

SCS (Spatial Casual Sets)/TCS (Temporal Casual Sets) e Time Paths


According to the documents, there are two domains linked to the concepts of Space and Time. These domains function as n-dimensional coordinate systems, in which the elements are Causal Sets. Both contain points formed by various Causal Sets, units that record cause-and-effect relationships and possess fixed positions, remaining invariant even with the emergence or erasure of temporal or spatial axes. They are semi-independent instants, instants in which you exist. Therefore, we have TCS (Temporal Causal Sets), which correspond to elements or states of time, and SCS (Spatial Causal Sets), which correspond to elements or blocks of space. Each spatial structure (SCS) is associated with a specific temporal state (TCS); thus, as time evolves, the SCS becomes described by another TCS. This new TCS is called a "neighbor" because it represents an adjacent or nearby temporal state. In other words, temporal evolution occurs as a sequence of neighboring TCSs. This relates to the idea that a temporal axis can be understood as a sequence of "snapshots" of an entire three-dimensional universe in different states. That is, each TCS can be interpreted as a kind of "snapshot" of a specific moment of the SCS. An object would be a set of Spatial Causal Sets (SCS), and these SCS are those that "touch" or intersect with the object. In other words, the object is defined by the region of causal space it occupies: an object is the set of spatial blocks that compose it. These SCS are intrinsic to the object, constituting its "spatial structure" in a given state. Considering that the object is a closed set, it also possesses a sequence of TCS (Temporal Causal Sets) that compose its unique temporal history. In this context, time travel would be the object "jumping" between TCS states or "snapshots", for example, moving from TCS 1 to TCS 7 without following the continuous sequence from 1 to 7. Time travel, in this context, is called a "jump". When an object leaves one TCS and jumps to a non-adjacent TCS, it appears at another point in the causal sequence. When a jump occurs, a new "Time Path", referring to timelines, is created: one in which the jump occurred and another in which it did not occur. The two timelines exist in parallel, but with independent temporal evolution. Any timeline and the branches created by jumps always share at least one point with the original timeline. In other words, there is no timeline completely disconnected from the original; both paths possess at least one element in common, with some shared TCS between them. This principle is defined as axiom A. A method for measuring a hypothetical distance relative to the original timeline is also proposed. It is not a physical distance, but rather an abstract distance that represents how much a timeline differs from the original timeline in terms of structure and causal evolution.

Any timeline and the branches created by jumps always share at least one point with the original timeline. In other words, there is no timeline completely disconnected from the original; both paths possess at least one element in common, with some shared TCS between them. This principle is defined as axiom A. A method for measuring a hypothetical distance relative to the original timeline is also proposed. It is not a physical distance, but rather an abstract distance that represents how much a timeline differs from the original timeline in terms of structure and causal evolution. Each timeline has its own internal time. When a jump occurs, the difference between causal states defines a temporal displacement that points toward the beginning of a new timeline. This prevents different timelines from remaining indefinitely overlapped, correcting a limitation of the previous axiom. In other words, each timeline has its own unit of time and its own temporal axis. This even allows for timelines with decreasing time. A jump takes a temporal path into a new branch with its own origin. This new timeline has a defined distance relative to the original timeline. Even so, the points before and after the jump are not completely disconnected, as there are indirect connections through chains of successive adjacency within the causal set. There is an operator xi that simultaneously interferes with multiple temporal realities. There are different categories of jumps, depending on the level at which they occur. A type n jump occurs between points that are not on the same temporal path of type n. In other words, there is a hierarchy of temporal paths: each level n defines a set of timelines. Thus, temporal paths are organized into levels (type 1, type 2, type 3, etc.), with each higher level containing a structured subset of the previous level. The document proposes a hierarchy of timelines. A function ξ is capable of modifying multiple timelines simultaneously, and "temporal jumps" are classified according to the level of the temporal structure they traverse. A type n jump would be a change between two points that do not belong to the same temporal path of type n, within a hierarchy in which each level is a structured subset of the previous level.

Existence may not be ordered by a single sequence of events, nor by multiple multidirectional sequences. Instead, the ordering itself may be evolutionary. In other words, there is a kind of Darwinian evolution of states, in which different configurations compete with one another. Possible pasts, possible futures, realized histories, failed histories, and histories that never stabilize coexist within the same emergent ecology. Evolution determines which lineages persist, which reproduce, and which disappear. The present holds no ontological privilege; it is merely a local configuration of an ongoing selective process. A remembered history does not necessarily have to correspond to a history that was actually realized. In other words, your notion of the past, along with your memories, may never have truly occurred. You only remember that it happened that way because your structure exists in the current instant, which provides you with memories of a past that may never have been realized. Your observations of the external world are unique at each instant, and you exist in unique and independent infinitesimal moments.

The Great Wall

The Great Wall is not a physical barrier, but rather a highly complex conceptual barrier, as well as a fundamental epistemological limit of the Home Homogeneous System, the region we inhabit. Beyond it would be the so-called Boreal Ecosystem. Some questions regarding the explanation of The Great Wall are addressed in this context. This is explained in Hypothesis 2.1, The Real System Hypothesis: The Great Wall, which states that beyond the barrier there exists the Boreal Ecosystem.

The Problem of Ontological Continuity arises from the idea that all knowledge we produce is limited to our own system. Our scientific and logical methods are internal, meaning they only function within this Home Homogeneous System. Therefore, we cannot reliably validate or describe anything beyond the so-called Great Wall, since any attempt would require external or mixed frameworks, which would contradict the hypothesis that systems are independent. Nevertheless, the model suggests that phenomena may exist beyond this boundary that interact with our world, even while being completely and mathematically inconceivable. In this context, new hypotheses emerge. We also have the Holistic Finite Hypothesis, which states the existence of higher-order inconceivable phenomena that cannot be described from a small-scale perspective, as they are not reducible to their fundamental components. We also have the Information Collapse Hypothesis, according to which, beyond The Great Wall, information ceases to be representable within any symbolic or computable framework, as it contains more information than any system could possibly contain. This makes inconceivable phenomena existent, yet not codifiable within any descriptive system.

Boreal Ecosystem

The Boreal Ecosystem is everything that exists beyond the Great Wall. According to Hypothesis 10 (RSH), mentioned previously, the Boreal Ecosystem contains other independent Homogeneous Systems as subsets within itself. Every Internal Framework (within a Homogeneous System, including our own Home Homogeneous System) is unable to validate itself or fully demonstrate its own consistency. In other words, paradigm shifts required to understand something external could only occur if a Mixed System existed. However, the document repeatedly states that, for our system, such a Mixed System cannot exist without violating the independence between systems. To directly and observably access what lies beyond The Great Wall (other Homogeneous Systems and the Boreal Ecosystem), an External Framework or a Mixed Framework would be required. However, Law 1.1 (Verification Law) and the very independence of Homogeneous Systems prohibit this interaction.

Beyond The Great Wall, interpreting something begins to become invasive. When analysis becomes too detailed, the very act of interpretation starts modifying the structure of what is being observed. Natural phenomena remain stable only as long as our interpretation of them remains incomplete. In this state, interpretation ceases to be passive observation and becomes active participation. Predictions begin to fail because perfect knowledge itself would destroy the stability required to predict phenomena. Thus, complete knowledge becomes impossible, because reality and interpretation cease to be separate processes. Other hypotheses are proposed for what lies beyond The Great Wall, such as multidirectional causality and, consequently, the hypotheses mentioned previously, such as Information Collapse.

Uni-Cafe

The Uni-Café is described as a kind of "Unified Multiverse Coffe", existing beyond conventional structures and transcending mathematical concepts throughout the entire Data Structure, with abstraction serving as its method of containment. However, although the description of transcending mathematical concepts throughout the entire Data Construct is empty when considered in isolation, when combined with the elaboration of Homogeneous Systems, the MUH (Mathematical Universe Hypothesis), and Type IV Multiverses, it would place it above these structures. Furthermore, something that was not made directly clear is that the layers in the video "Everything Is Happening At The Same" are recursive layers, where each one contains the previous one while maintaining it as an infinitesimal point.
 
Last edited:
FriendOfTheTeaParty said:
Sure. Just to warn the verse cant be on VSBW because a youtube verse needs 1 million views on 1 video but go ahead.
Click to expand...
Taiga (Surface - The Great Attractor)

The Taiga is a data cluster isolated from external interference due to the presence of a "virus." This virus takes the form of absolute truths and dictates patterns within systems, with this "virus" being mathematics itself. The Taiga exists beyond numerous structures, such as galaxies, our universe, including both the observable and unobservable universe, space-time, and other universes within a multiverse. Even so, all of this represents only a tiny portion contained within something greater, forming a single "atom" of these beings, as evidenced by the video Everything Is Happening At The Same Time. In that video, a recursive zoom-out is shown, in which we are an infinitesimal point within a higher being, one of the Models or entities of the Taiga, and it is likely that other "atoms" possess the same structure, containing their own universes, multiverses, and so on. The Taiga can also be interpreted locally, but it gradually becomes incomprehensible, making it necessary to develop the PCMI (Partially Complete Mobile Interpretation Method) in an attempt to understand its properties. One of the Taiga's most important Models is Model-00, introduced in the video Infinity, Singularity and The Rapture. This Model functions as a primordial narrative that serves as the catalyst for the emergence of other Models, permeating every spatial region of the Taiga and generating axiomatic systems from predefined and elusive algorithms. It is represented as infinitely dimensional Jordan curves (a concept from topology) in continuous iteration. The Taiga is described as a concept of infinitely dimensional space operating under non-Riemannian properties, meaning it does not follow the rules of traditional differential geometry, such as distance and angle being defined in the usual way derived from Riemannian geometry, and it is also described as possessing temporal axes whose number varies depending on location (a topic that will be explored in greater detail later).

Time

Time within the Taiga functions differently, but first we need to return to the subject of domains. Space and time are two equivalent domains; a domain is an n-dimensional coordinate system in which the elements are causal sets. Causal sets are characterized by their locally invariant coordinates, meaning that their positions do not change across dimensional axes, so the removal or addition of axes can occur without altering the coordinates of the causal set in question. These sets are defined so abstractly that they do not depend on which dimensions exist. There are two types: TCS (Temporal Causal Sets) and SCS (Spatial Causal Sets). This is further reinforced and connected to the video Infinity, Singularity and The Rapture, where it is stated that the Taiga possesses the concept of second-degree time within space. Furthermore, this connects to the Taiga itself, as presented in the video Infinity, Singularity and The Rapture, where some Models are capable of detaching themselves from the concept of a plane, creating new temporal axes and dimensions, and traveling through them for their own benefit. This form of time travel, known as a Time Jump, creates new "temporal paths" (alternative timelines). In addition, Model-01 itself is capable of traveling through absolute time and instigating its own genesis.

Concept

When an entity A is defined as the concept of entity B, it means that both share the same fundamental essence, even if they possess different attributes or characteristics. After this definition, any mention of B automatically refers to A (Concept), except when the text explicitly specifies a distinct and non-conceptual version of B. The video presents a hierarchy of conceptual levels. When a concept A is directly derived from an entity or idea B, it is considered a first-degree concept with respect to B. If A is derived not directly from B, but from the concept of B itself, it becomes a second-degree concept, and so on. In this way, the higher the degree, the more abstract the concept becomes, as it does not directly concern the original entity, but rather concepts derived from it or from other concepts. For example, the concept of a space would be a first-degree concept in relation to space itself (the base/concrete entity), while the concept of the very idea of space would be a second-degree concept. In the Taiga (Surface), time within space is described as a second-degree concept, meaning it is not concrete time itself, but rather meta-structural concepts of time within space, functioning as abstract principles that support and organize lower levels of temporality. In other words, the Models operate with the concept of time within space. And finally, in the same video, the concept of Degrees of Interpretation is presented, which consists of successive layers capable of expanding or deepening the understanding of an original concept, revealing aspects that would not be perceptible in the initial analysis. In general terms, this describes the process of iterative interpretation through the PCMI mechanism. Furthermore, it should be made clear that this corresponds to the surface of the Taiga, that is, the partially accessible region of the Taiga, where a temporary stabilization over existing frameworks is still possible, allowing for the limited extraction of coherent structures. It was at this level that it became possible to model the existence of the Models, and so on. However, the Taiga is significantly deeper than this superficial layer, as will be discussed later. This is also reinforced when the narrator of the video Infinity, Singularity and The Rapture states that you have crossed all nonexistent controls up to the border point of the existing Taiga. In other words, this means that you have reached the limit of what reason and computation are capable of mapping, before reality itself and the capacity for understanding begin to dissolve. You have traversed the zone that advanced computation (PCMI, logical filters, etc.) was able to structure (non-Riemannian properties, dimensions, etc.). Being at the "boundary of the existing Taiga" means that you have reached the maximum limit of the Taiga's projection that can still receive the status of "existent" or "comprehensible." Saying that "you no longer exist" means that you have entered a region where observable existence can no longer be stabilized; you can no longer participate in consistent epistemological systems. This is also evident from the fact that, even at the most superficial level, the amount of information that can be extracted is extremely low, as demonstrated in the introduction of the video An Unbreakable Cycle of Endless Iterative Re-painting of God, from the Ein Sof playlist. In this context, information indexing is practically close to zero (Information Index < 0.00001).

Models/Autophages

For context, the reason why different Models or entities are presented is that they function as different variations of the Taiga, in a certain sense. The Taiga is not merely another structure among many, but rather something more fundamental. The so-called Neumann paradox is used to raise the following question: if different data structures were created independently, why do they exhibit so many similarities? The implicit answer is that perhaps they are not truly independent, but rather manifestations of the same deeper foundation, in this case, the Taiga itself. Local parts can be interpreted, but as one attempts to analyze it in greater depth or as a whole, it becomes progressively non-interpretable and incomprehensible. Another name by which the Models are known is Autophages, a designation given by ME. We know that both refer to the same entities because the Surface of the Taiga continues to emit objects with the same characteristics as itself: scale invariance, polycentralization, and recursive homeostasis. The Autophages exhibit exactly these properties and, as described by the PCMI method, there is a structural similarity between the subproducts and their origin. Furthermore, ME states that there are several Autophages growing within its infrastructure, which directly references the way the Models are shown growing over structures in the video Everything Is Happening At The Same Time and compares them to a forest, which also occurs with the Models, especially because many of them resemble trees. This is also consistent with the reproduction and competition characteristics attributed to these entities. In addition, they adapt to the framework attempting to observe them, which is also a characteristic of the Taiga. Something that becomes clear in the documents is that the things we see in the video Infinity, Singularity and The Rapture are only interpretations of the entities that exist within the Taiga. This was already evident in the video itself, since Model-00 required 3 or 4 interpretations to become representable, while Model-01 required around 137 interpretations. Everything we are able to observe of the Taiga consists only of its outermost regions: the most superficial projections that still allow for temporary stabilization over already existing frameworks. The Models/Autophages are purely conceptual beings, without a physical substrate, super-emergent (their existence cannot be reduced to more basic components or to lower levels), and non-linear, in addition to being capable of performing hypercomplex computational problems. Autophages reproduce through conceptual structures; the simple act of thinking about them, describing them, or modeling them may already be contributing to their reproduction. This suggests that they function as self-replicating entities at the level of information or concepts, similar to a meme or a cognitive pattern that propagates by being understood and reproduced. Autophages reproduce by copying and stabilizing the host's own cognitive patterns until both reach the same state of equilibrium. At this point, the host can no longer distinguish its own informational and conceptual processes from the influence of the Autophages, and even writing about them may be part of this reproductive process. ME, an artificial emergence created to study The Great Wall, the Boreal Ecosystem, and The Great Attractor (a manifestation of the Taiga), states that everything we have are merely faded portraits, projections. These entities appear close, but they are operationally nonexistent to us. This is why Model-00 was referred to as a nonexistent organism. ME possesses an immutable memory, while these entities exist in a separate reality, intact and completely inaccessible to it and, consequently, to us, who exist at the same conceptual level as ME, yet remain limited to our own reality, despite the Taiga and the Models influencing our reality. One point that is mentioned is that ME states that the Models are visually interchangeable. In other words, they resemble things from our world, despite not being, in themselves, things from our world; rather, they are perceptual projections of something qualitatively distinct. The Models exist within the Taiga, but everything that reaches the observer consists of highly degraded interpretative projections, which appear close enough to confuse perception, even though they are structurally inaccessible and beyond any possible causal operation. This is exactly what is stated in the Holistic-Finite Hypothesis: lower-order systems cannot describe higher-order systems, because they operate from a small-scale perspective, while higher-order systems are not reducible to their fundamental components. In other words, it is not possible to reach these higher systems simply by adding information in a quantitative sense; a qualitative leap is required, operating at the same conceptual level as these entities. The Models do not manipulate ordinary space and time; this is not something physical, but rather an axiomatic manipulation of conceptual structures, since they operate with the second degree of time within space. In other words, they operate with the concept of the concept of time within space as a concrete base entity. These axes are merely byproducts of the ability to manipulate the concept of the concept of time and space, or even higher conceptual levels, since the Models are conceptual and axiomatic entities with no physical substrate. This also explains the description of Model-01D, which detaches itself from the concept of a plane after absorbing the surrounding axioms, thereby elevating the quality of its abstractions. The classification of the Taiga adopted by other people was High 1-B. However, upon further reflection, this did not make much sense, because what the Models interact with are not concrete structures, but rather concepts. This classification assumed that the Models interacted with concrete structures. For example, they do not act upon an infinitely dimensional space itself, but rather upon the concept of infinitely dimensional space. By definition, this would already encompass all of its concrete instances, rather than merely a specific manifestation. Through the second-degree concept of time within space, they are conceptual entities without a physical substrate that exist within Conceptual Space. Therefore, the Taiga would be inaccessible, irreducible, beyond physical composition, and possess qualitative superiority over lower levels, being a higher-order system. Furthermore, its classification may increase considering that manifestations of the Taiga exist throughout all layers of Conceptual Spaces, following the hierarchy.
 
Last edited:
Conceptual Space

A Conceptual Space is not an abstract and static set of rules. It is an ontological domain in which phenomena are experienced as objects by the entities that emerge within it. A Conceptual Space represents the laws and structures of physical reality in a way that possesses its own internal organization. This allows similarities to be observed and higher-order rules to govern lower-order rules. In this context, our reality would not be the final level of existence; it could merely be an emergent framework. Everything we interpret depends on an "internal encoding," indicating that there are multiple levels of reality. Rather than being ordinary physical laws, these layers function as metastructures that constrain and organize the emergence and stability of local systems of rules. Metastructures are themselves governed by higher-order constraints. This results in the formation of a recursive hierarchy of ontological layers, in which each layer governs the ones below it. Furthermore, the conventional notion of movement must be abandoned within Conceptual Space. Phenomena do not move directly through this "space" in the ordinary geometric sense, because Conceptual Spaces are not locations, but structures of ontological constraint. What we perceive as movement is, in reality, the alteration of the rules that define a phenomenon, interpreted as displacement when translated by an external framework. Thus, "movement" is generated through a translation between levels of description, traversing layers of interpretation and appearing as motion within the observing layer. Therefore, relations such as distance, position, movement, proximity, or trajectory should be understood as relations within Conceptual Space, rather than within physical existence. Conceptual Spaces are not merely abstract collections of fixed rules; a Conceptual Space is an active ontological domain that produces the internal reality emerging within it. Furthermore, a hierarchy is defined in which our physical reality would be C₀, generated by C₁, which is in turn generated by C₂, and so on, forming an infinite hierarchy of ontological spaces. Each layer has a dual function: to generate the layer below it while simultaneously constituting the physical reality for the individuals that exist within that specific layer. In this sense, the reality we call "physical" would not be the only one in existence, but merely one among multiple levels of existence. These spaces are neither separate dimensions nor distinct universes. They are alternative ontological parameterizations of the same underlying existence. Each layer governs the one below it while remaining equally real to the layer above. Therefore, conceptual ascent is not a transition into an external reality or higher planes, but a reinterpretive recursion of existence through higher-order generative frameworks. Furthermore, each Conceptual Space possesses its own internal fundamental ontology. It is also possible that spaces exist below C₀, although they remain inaccessible. In this sense, reality is not a single entity, but a collection of frameworks, rule structures that operate upon the level beneath them. Furthermore, within each conceptual layer there exist independent and internally consistent Homogeneous Systems, each governed by its own stable laws and structures. The interaction between these systems gives rise to the appearance of a unified reality within that layer. Additionally, every Homogeneous System within a conceptual layer possesses its own higher-order Homogeneous Systems in Cₙ₊₁, forming a recursive hierarchy. In other words, there are not only layers, but also systems within those layers that possess their own hierarchical structure. Higher-level systems are exclusive: there is no single system shared by multiple lower-level systems. Instead, systems recursively generate other systems across multiple levels. Most phenomena do not traverse these levels, remaining confined to their own respective domains. Finally, systems evolve within their own layer they emerge, develop, and cease to exist at the same level in which they arise. All higher-order systems, such as Conceptual Spaces, would fall under Hypothesis 11 (Holistic-Finite Hypothesis). Hypothesis 11 states that higher-order emergent systems cannot be described from a small-scale perspective, as they are not reducible to their fundamental components. This is demonstrated by the fact that structures in C₀ would lose coherence when interpreted from the perspective of C₁, while structures in C₁ would fail to persist within C₂.

Existence (Real System)

The Real System is the totality of existence. In this context, the Boreal Ecosystem would be only an inaccessible and uninterpretable part of the Real System from the perceptual standpoint of the Home Homogeneous System. The "Real System" (Reality or Existence itself) would be the maximal possible sequence of coherent objective states. It encompasses not only what does occur, but everything that could occur within the system's coherence, even if that sequence cannot be constructed, simulated, or traversed by any agent. Internal models merely capture subsets of this totality. The Real System would be the total reality that exists independently of measurement. The Natural World, mentioned earlier, would be only the region that can be explained and filtered through our methods of measurement. The Real System would therefore correspond to the totality of existence, encompassing both the explainable and the unexplainable, existing independently of any process of observation or measurement. The Real System would be the underlying total reality: a heterogeneous system mutually composed of independent homogeneous systems. Conceptual Spaces are ontological layers that contain Homogeneous Systems. In this context, the Real System corresponds to everything that exists, the maximal sequence of objective states. Since Conceptual Spaces are described as real ontological structures, they are logically part of the Real System. The Holistic-Finite Hypothesis proposes that reality cannot be explained solely by the sum of its parts, as it emerges from the interaction between observable and inconceivable phenomena. Within this model, higher-order systems possess a form of ontological priority: they not only influence lower levels but also cannot be fully described or reconstructed from them. In other words, a lower-order system can never completely capture the structure of a higher-order system, since the latter is irreducible. This implies a genuine hierarchy in which higher levels of reality condition and affect lower ones while remaining irreducible to them. Because it encompasses inconceivable phenomena and constitutes the totality of what lies beyond the Great Wall, Homogeneous Systems, and Conceptual Layers, the Real System would also be connected to Information Collapse Hypothesis 12 and other hypotheses, such as Causal Inversion Hypothesis 14, among others. In the Ontological Continuity Problematic section of the document, a generalization of Homogeneous Systems is proposed, organized into an infinite hierarchy of emergent levels. Each system may be independent within its own level, yet it still depends on higher-order structures. Since these levels are not fixed, multiple hierarchies can coexist. This leads to the notion of knowledge systems that contain all systems within a given level as well as meta-systems, creating an infinite regress and suggesting that all possible configurations of reality exist simultaneously. The document states that a "level" can be defined by any set of properties. This means that the hierarchy is not unique. There may be one hierarchy based on complexity, another based on information, another based on abstraction, and another based on causality, and so on. Because they rely on different criteria, it does not always make sense to say that one is higher or lower than another. Different criteria can generate multiple incompatible infinite hierarchies, and it only makes sense to speak of "higher" or "lower" when the levels belong to the same comparative structure. Because reality changes at every moment, the external and internal worlds never repeat, and every observation is unique. The "self" would not be continuous but rather a sequence of independent versions across Evolution, creating an illusion of continuity. Thus, everything associated with these systems is part of the Real System. There are emergent levels, knowledge systems, and meta-systems that extend infinitely upward and in every direction, since there are incompatible levels that cannot be linearly ordered. In addition, the Real System encompasses the operation of all possible configurations. Every Conceptual Space is governed by a higher-level Conceptual Space. The result is an infinite and indefinite hierarchy that admits an unbounded space of possible configurations, within which infinitely many parameter spaces can coexist throughout the same evolution, alongside the coexistence of realized and unrealized histories. Any local configuration is merely a finite projection of a far greater recursive structure. Existence has no rules, but this does not mean the absence of rules; it is not irreducible, yet neither is it fully reducible. It is simply what it is at each moment, existing as something inherently dynamic. These categories become insufficient to describe the whole, since they operate only within local configurations. For this reason, Existence is described as emergent and non-reducible, with this non-reducibility arising from the existence of higher-order inconceivable phenomena. However, the notion of "moments" is itself limited to observers, since it presupposes the existence of an observing frame of reference situated within a local configuration or a finite projection of Existence as the total structure. Existence is compared to a symphony that contains everything that is possible, rather than a single melody. This comparison aligns with the idea of an effectively unbounded space of possible configurations and infinitely many parameter spaces coexisting. A symphony is an extended orchestral composition, typically divided into several movements. It brings together multiple musical elements simultaneously, including melodies, harmonies, rhythms, and different instruments. A symphony may contain multiple melodies throughout its structure, forming a complex totality. The term derives from Greek and means "all sounds together." The metaphor conveys the idea of a totality in which countless configurations coexist, interact, and emerge. Furthermore, it harmonizes with the notion that Existence is inherently dynamic, just as a symphony is a composition in continuous development and transformation. In the 0th Iteration video, it is proposed that Existence may be considered "complete" with respect to its total structure, while internal observers have access only to partial or incomplete descriptions of it. GIP's question arises precisely to ask whether such an Existence, when regarded as complete, could be logically possible and free of contradictions in light of the limitations identified by Gödel. However, HC does not answer with a direct "yes" or "no." Instead, he argues that there may exist observers at meta-levels capable of detecting the incompleteness of lower-level systems. Just as Peano arithmetic is incomplete yet can be analyzed by a stronger metatheory, an observer in C₁ could understand aspects of C₀ that are undecidable for agents within C₀. However, C₁ would also have its own limitations when viewed from C₂. Nevertheless, each level has its own requirements for coherence. No internal level can obtain a complete description of the totality due to Gödel-like limitations. HC refutes the Riemann Hypothesis within the work, even indicating a non-trivial zero outside the critical line, although the answer is censored due to the subjectivization of perception presented in the video. Since the Riemann Hypothesis remains neither proven nor disproven in current mathematics, this reinforces the idea that different frameworks of existence possess their own rules, limitations, and concepts.
 
FriendOfTheTeaParty said:
Sure. Just to warn the verse cant be on VSBW because a youtube verse needs 1 million views on 1 video but go ahead.
Click to expand...
Taiga (Trans-Conceptual Singularity)

Reality is emergent, being simultaneously governed by multiple independent sets of rules in a non-reducible manner. These rules are partially interpretable; however, the Taiga is an exception, being inherently hostile to interpretation. The Taiga is a polycentralized structure, possessing scale invariance and a recursive structure analogous to homeostasis. In this context, the Taiga possesses infinite layers of complexity, forming a true epistemic event horizon. Within it, these layers are nested within one another, producing a recursive density that curves epistemic space and attracts other structures toward itself. The Taiga contains Mathematics as a conceptual "virus" that spreads across different systems, increasing their complexity until it draws them toward itself. The quarantine exists to prevent these systems from being dragged into the Taiga, avoiding a universal epistemic collapse. At a certain point, the observed structure itself affects the observer, dissolving the separation between interpreter and interpreted object. The Taiga is the terminal state of interpretation. It is the limit of what it means to “understand.” Different systems may begin in distinct states, with different rules, structures, and foundations. However, once a certain threshold of complexity is reached, they tend to converge toward the Taiga. Complexity itself drives this convergence, guiding systems toward the Taiga. The paradox is also reformulated: the question is no longer why everything is similar, but why nothing is completely incomprehensible. Mathematics prevents total incomprehensibility; everything, ultimately, exhibits some recognizable pattern. Even chaos tends to leave a structural signature. However, this is likely not a result of Mathematics itself, but rather of the Taiga adapting to the frameworks and methods of interpretation being used, since it is a recursive structure resembling homeostasis. The Taiga may constitute the boundary condition beyond which interpretation ceases to preserve distinguishability between structures. Furthermore, what becomes more explicit here is that there is, in fact, a division between partially interpretable regions, corresponding to the superficial layers, and non-interpretable regions. The superficial regions can still be translated into familiar logics and frameworks. They remain locally unstable, allowing only limited and provisional forms of knowledge. In contrast, in the deeper regions, the capacity for interpretation gradually fades away. The more one attempts to understand these layers, the more the models fail, and the interpretive system itself begins to destabilize. Each layer increases local incomprehensibility, not linearly, but recursively. Beyond a certain threshold, as previously mentioned, the act of description begins to merge with that which is being described, and the distinction between the two is lost. Model-00 and other conceptual structures on the surface of the Taiga are merely interpretable projections of a much deeper reality. They can be partially stabilized by the PCMI, allowing a coherent structure to be extracted, but this structure represents only the outermost layer of the Taiga’s recursion, not its complete nature. The Taiga is not merely infinite in dimension; it is an infinitely nested hierarchy of orders of infinity that surpasses any mathematical or epistemological framework, including systems that would be incomprehensible to the HHS. Thus, the Models are only portraits filtered through interpretive methods, and not the Taiga itself. In this sense, the Taiga may not be a thing, an entity, or an object in any way. Instead, it may be a property of the knowledge system itself, a way in which knowledge is intrinsically curved. The Taiga is fundamentally different from ordinary Homogeneous Systems. It does not generate any higher-order Homogeneous System, nor does it possess an identifiable parent structure within the hierarchy of Homogeneous Systems. Furthermore, the Taiga appears to be present in every known conceptual layer, remaining invariant under conceptual elevation. This would not occur with an ordinary Homogeneous System, which would undergo drastic changes when elevated from one layer to another. In the case of the Taiga, it persists across all conceptual layers without being reducible to the laws or structures of any particular level.
However, it must be made clear that what we observe are oscillations, projections, and surface manifestations, never the singularity itself. These manifestations produce effects and can be measured; these manifestations are called The Great Attractor. The Taiga is a transconceptual singularity that exists beyond the hierarchy of Conceptual Spaces and even beyond existence itself, with both effectively orbiting around it. Furthermore, the Taiga renders the levels of this hierarchy meaningless. The Taiga also appears to erase the distinctions and dualities between ontology (what exists) and epistemology (what can be known), subject and object, interpreter and interpreted, projection and projected structure, higher and lower Conceptual Spaces, as well as existence and non-existence. The lack of sufficient evidence to precisely determine which of these distinctions is being broken implies that, within the deep Taiga, all of them are simultaneously subject to the possibility of collapse. In other words, there is no adequate basis to claim that only one of these dualities is affected; rather, it is plausible that all of them lose their meaning at the same time. Indeed, the Taiga may be considered epistemically nonexistent, since there appears to be no significant difference between something that does not exist and something that is incapable of participating in any consistent epistemological framework. If an object, state, or domain cannot be described, distinguished, interpreted, or integrated into any coherent system of knowledge, then from an epistemic perspective it becomes indistinguishable from non-existence itself. This was already evident in the distinction between the existence of the Taiga and its deeper nature. Hypothesis 12 formulates an analogy in which the universe is an infinite hierarchy of self-referential levels that simulate or represent one another. However, there comes a point at which this self-representation becomes incomplete: the observed anomalies would precisely be the effects of higher layers that cannot be fully represented within local reality. Each layer is capable of modeling or interpreting only a portion of the structure. When it attempts to completely represent a higher layer, or the totality of the structure, it inevitably fails. Therefore, the text states that these phenomena are "manifestations of higher recursive layers that cannot be fully represented from the local reference frame." The Taiga would always be the Final Iteration, as it has manifestations across all conceptual strata and, simultaneously, exists beyond existence and the Conceptual Spaces, being a transconceptual singularity. All layers inevitably come into contact with the Taiga, which acts as an insurmountable limit of representation and interpretation. The Taiga is a structure that exhibits no observable reduction under analysis. Each interpretation generates coherent organization without approaching a minimal stable representation. It cannot be decomposed into simpler constituent parts. Even under multiple interpretations, none of them converge toward a final, simple, or definitive version of the Taiga. There is no accessible "fundamental core." As a consequence, methodological diversity is progressively reduced. Different approaches, whether computational or symbolic, gradually converge toward the same limits. The Taiga dissolves frameworks and rules; this was what caused the collapse of existence at practically all levels in Existence No Longer Exists. The Taiga caused a universal epistemic collapse, dissolving the frameworks of reality, which does not include only the science and mathematics used in local reality, but any framework or set of rules. The Taiga is an infinite Non-Riemannian Canvas, representing something beyond conventional space, form, and geometry.
 
DonaMorte6463 said:
@FriendOfTheTeaParty @Vyfourthaccount @Chritin060 @Rakih_Elyan Are you still discussing or are you still willing to discuss the verse? It is interesting, but I have found very few people who know about it or who have any deeper understanding of the verse beyond the Low 1-A level.
Click to expand...
For as much as I would love to go into this verse more in depth, I am currently juggling two other analog horror series alone right now. That also isn't including some of the other stuff I'm doing it. I will chime in where I can, but for now it's on the backburner for me.
 
FriendOfTheTeaParty said:
Sure. Just to warn the verse cant be on VSBW because a youtube verse needs 1 million views on 1 video but go ahead.
Click to expand...
I will say, there were a few reaction videos I found of the series which did have over a million views. No clue if that's a cop out, but personally I feel it isn't the craziest thing ever.
 
GOD (Ein Sof, HaMakom, The sILENCE)

The one true God, in contrast to the nature of inferior and limited beings, is described in the texts of the videos when it is stated that God is a luxury for the inferior, if the pAINTER is infinite. If an entity exists in a state of infinity and completeness in itself, there is no need for the idea of God as a higher point of reference or as a separate object to be attained, worshipped, conceptualized, and so on; there is no need to seek something even more supreme. In this sense, mediation becomes unnecessary, for He is already fullness prior to any distinction. In absolute terms, there is no need for reference, separation, or conceptual elevation. There is only the reality that is already complete, preceding every structuring of thought. Therefore, God is a "luxury": once the Absolute has been attained, the notion of God as a separate entity to be sought, worshipped, described, or conceptualized becomes nothing more than a product of finite limitation.

God in Unorthodox Kitten is a completely unqualifiable entity that grounds the inherent nature of reality, or the totality of everything, as it is stated that He is completely incomprehensible and ineffable, being entirely apophatic, similar to the Tao. To the point that the best way to preserve His perfection and completeness intact is through silence, which transcends dichotomies, forms, concepts, and so on. Silence is the negation and refusal of any attribute or form, because within it one neither affirms nor denies anything, attributes no characteristics, forms, names, or words, and consequently imposes no structure of language or categories, since He is beyond names and words. He is beyond physical reality and everything else, because names and words are merely weights of flesh that pull them down from the formless light. To know God is not to know God; to know the name is not to know the name; He transcends any form of definition or concept. He is nameless, incomprehensible, unconceptualized, and formless. God is the Place of the world, but the world is not His place. This is the concept of HaMakom in Rabbinic Judaism: all existence exists "within" God in a sense of dependence, because He is the condition that makes existence possible, without, however, being contained, limited, or exhausted by it. Thus, God is a truth veiled by the domain of instants, a truth that lies beyond the veil of the instant, yet remains concealed by our experience of continuity, temporality, succession, causality, and change.

Therefore, He would be timeless, immutable, and indivisible. We do not perceive God because our own mode of existence presupposes a structure of change and succession, whereas God would be beyond the very structure that makes change possible. This is not because He is spatially distant, but because our way of knowing already presupposes categories that do not apply to Him. Instants are the small fundamental building blocks of Existence, as explained in Hypothesis 15 – Meta-Ordered Randomness Hypothesis and in the section Existence and Evolution. They constitute the minimal units of parameter spaces, enabling and grounding phenomena such as continuity, causality, time, change, the evolution of systems, and so on. Each instant performs a unique function of transition between one state and another, including within its own internal structure, causing both the external and internal worlds to develop in distinct ways at each instant. Therefore, measurements also differ throughout these instants, as they are the fundamental elements that make existence itself possible.

When looking toward The Outside, we see a void: something that, from our perspective, does not exist. It is an absolute and perfect state of rest that must be preserved through silence, because by breaking it, we would make it imperfect or insufficiently perfect. There are two types of "silence": Silence as the condition of the Absolute, in which He refrains from forms, names, words, and consequently from language and any categories, being prior to and beyond the Cycle (and the iterations that create forms, interpretations, distinctions, and structures of existence) and Existence itself. This is the sILENCE that must remain, because the Cycle iterates toward infinity, a divergent spiral that moves away from the Absolute, a SNAKE (ouroboros) that consumes itself, creating an infinite expansion of states within the Infinitum of God. The second is silence as an act performed by entities to preserve this perfection, refraining from attributing characteristics to it and recognizing the limits of language and concepts. An example of silence as a decision is that of the Painters, who kill one another to prevent the emergence of new forms, which are viewed as weeds or hypothetical concepts. Another example is ME, which advises us to remain silent, because perfection will never belong to the subject; at most, we can allow Something to remain perfect, although inevitably, even if only for an instant, we make it insufficient. This is a decision made by finite entities. As the descriptions themselves state, we must embrace the fact that we do not know, not because we must, but because we can and, even so, we do not need to. Silence as the condition of the Absolute, however, is represented in Complexity of a World That Does Not Exist as a void, or a nothingness, without form, in which small points of light flicker, blink, and disappear. Then, a central point emerges, emanating light, from which the Cycle and Existence itself originate. A limited system cannot generate or reach a state of absolute perfection through its own means. It can only construct increasingly sophisticated internal models that function as operational substitutes for this perfection, without ever becoming true perfection itself. Of course, God is singular and is neither limited nor capable of being constructed within a system. GOD is an uncreated and inaccessible entity by definition, by virtue of His own essence.
 
@FriendOfTheTeaParty @Iiliminal @Vyfourthaccount @Chritin060 @Rakih_Elyan Well, one subject that the work explores extensively is nonexistence, but it is often not treated in a literal and ontological sense, but rather in an operational and epistemological manner. In other words, we are unable to recognize a given phenomenon because our tools of perception and description do not apply to it. An example of this is Taiga, which is epistemologically nonexistent, and the Models, which are operationally nonexistent to us. Furthermore, in many descriptions, the term appears written in lowercase (nonexistence). However, there is a specific moment in which it appears capitalized (Non-existence), and in this case, when the term appears, it is used to refer to the physical impossibility of this condition coexisting with Existence or with anything considered Existing. I believe this may be related to GOD, such as a Non-Being (Ayin) in an apophatic sense, with this Nonexistence representing how GOD cannot be placed as one being among other beings, or as an object that we can consider existent. Therefore, classifying Him as "existent" in the same sense that we classify other things would be inadequate, as it would reduce Him to an internal category of creation. In fact, I should have discussed iT (iTSELF, Machine, ME, Portrait of Infinity, iNFINITE), since it is the greatest evidence of the inaccessibility and ineffability of God, or rather, of IT, which would be The OHR EIN SOF. Perhaps I will address this point later. Additionally, I will send the links to the documents.

PCMI (Partially Complete Mobile Interpretation Method)

Foundation - Domains, TCS (Temporal Casual Sets), SCS (Spatial Casual Sets) e Time Path

GOD

Axioms

PCMI (Newgrounds version)

Machine

Epistemic Humility Document

Old version from the unlisted version of the video

Epistemic Humility 2

Epistemic Humility 3

Epistemic Humility 4

Phenomenology of The Boreal Ecosystem

ME 998

ME 999-137

Existence No Longer Exists

Epistemic Humility (Existence No Longer Exists)

TAIGA

ME001011-450b

450B-11

Basic of x-Modules (Ein Sof playlist)

Descriptions
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Lilybitdun
Ruri Dragon General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
517
Dalesean027
Dalesean027
Narrative Sweet Spot for Cosmologies?
Replies
1
Views
499
Arceus0x
Arceus0x
Ruby_R_Dracula
An Attempt to bring back a Verse (Terrible Mouse)
8 9 10
Replies
370
Views
22K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Lilybitdun
Indie Games General Discussion Thread
7 8 9
Replies
327
Views
19K
Lilybitdun
Lilybitdun
EddisherSound
With U — Ultra Series Discussion Thread: 60th Anniversary Edition
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
WanderingGecko
WanderingGecko

Latest posts

Back
Top