Type 3 Nonduality Question

[Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara]

If a character exists in a many-valued logic state (which would be type 3 ND), but only for a single duality (which would be type 1), what type would we list on their profile? For example, a character exists in a state where they transcend the duality of true and false, where they cannot be defined as true, false, true and false, and neither true nor false, but instead a separate fifth state. However, this only applies to the duality of true and false and nothing else, so what would they get?

 

[NHTkenshin2]

As in, the character can exist in any truth value of only a single duality?

If that's the question then, following. Because I too have asked that before.

 

[Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara]

As in, the character can exist in any truth value of only a single duality?

No, they exist outside all of those truth values. But it still only applies to a single duality.

 

[Fixxed]

Still type 3, his atribute already in higher logic, so no matter if that just a one (a pair) atribute it still exist or simulate or obey the 5th truth state

 

[Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara]

Swag if true
these revisions are about to be so goddamn funny

 

[StrymULTRA]

I'd say a limited Type 3?

 

[Slimthincracker]

Type 1

 

[Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara]

Well that's 3 different answers, so I'd appreciate it if there was some kind of consensus here lol

 

[Georredannea15]

This is type 1, because for type 3 all duality systems must also have multiple logic and truth states, if a character transcends the multiple truth states of the "light-darkness" duality, it does not mean that that character will be unaffected and non-interactive by the death-life duality(or other dualities.)

So, this is type 1.

 

[Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara]

Feels weird to not have a different aspect type for many-valued logic relative to a single duality, but alright. How would I format this on the profiles? Since I don't want people to think some characters have equal degrees of transduality just because they're all type 1.

 

[Benimōru]

Regardless of the truth state, if there is only one dual system, then its just type 1. Tho I remember that in such cases it should be noted as higher degree of type 1 or something similar to that.

 

[ActuallySpaceMan42]

Feels weird to not have a different aspect type for many-valued logic relative to a single duality, but alright. How would I format this on the profiles? Since I don't want people to think some characters have equal degrees of transduality just because they're all type 1.

Greater Nonduality (Nature 2, Aspect 1; Explanation)

Anos does stuff like that and it gets accepted, so it should be fine.

 

[Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara]

Greater Nonduality (Nature 2, Aspect 1; Explanation)

Yeah, that works.

Anos does stuff like that and it gets accepted, so it should be fine.

He better not have, I didn't even take my eyes off the verse for that long.

 

[Georredannea15]

Greater Nonduality (Nature 2, Aspect 1; Explanation)

Anos does stuff like that and it gets accepted, so it should be fine.

Greater? No this does not apply to non-duality/Transduality, Also Anos got this for Acausality type 4 not transduality.

And if there is such a thing, I haven't seen it

 

[Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara]

Greater? No this does not apply to non-duality/Transduality,

Not sure how else you'd index someone who exists outside a many-valued logic system that exists outside a system transcendent of logic, but if you have any better suggestions I'm all ears.

 

[Georredannea15]

Not sure how else you'd index someone who exists outside a many-valued logic system that exists outside a system transcendent of logic, but if you have any better suggestions I'm all ears.

I honestly don't know, but I've never seen a "Greater" non-duality/transduality.

And in this case, I don't know if it's called Greater or not. As a result, as in the type 1 we know, it will be immune to the duality and will not be affected.

However, the only difference is that a character that affects beings transcending this duality cannot affect a character that transcends logical states. I guess there is no other difference. So instead of writes "Greater", it would be better to explain this context well in the profile.(Well... i guess)

Is there anything I missed?

 

[Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara]

Is there anything I missed?

Uhh probably, but that's only because I'm still working out how the hell this logic system even works. It's confusing as hell ngl