Type 2 Concept Qualifications

[TheUnshakableOne]

What are some very detailed, and good examples of Type 2 Conceptual Manipulation? What are some qualifications for it?

I heard one example of a qualification is a concept that has always existed and will continue to exist before the creation of the cosmology of the verse and will continue even after its destruction. is that true? What are some other qualifications?

 

[TheUnshakableOne]

bump...

 

[Imaginym]

I am also interested in the answer to this question.

 

[Hl3_or_bust]

The main qualifications are for the concept to persist past the existence of its instances in reality, such as destroying every door not altering the concept of "door" as it would for a type 3 concept. The other main one is for reality to participate in it, rather than vice versa, which is mainly dealt with by concepts being described as transcendental to my knowledge.

 

[TheUnshakableOne]

The main qualifications are for the concept to persist past the existence of its instances in reality"

What does this part mean?

 

[Hl3_or_bust]

If you destroy every door in existence, the type 3 concept of a door would cease to exist, while a type 2 concept would continue to exist.

 

[TheUnshakableOne]

If you destroy every door in existence, the type 3 concept of a door would cease to exist, while a type 2 concept would continue to exist.

I assume something such as Darkness, Life, Death, Discord/War is very verse oriented with their cosmology?

 

[Lawiegg]

Is existing as non existing or an erased concept count as NEP type 2?

 

[Livinmeme]

i think another qualification is that the concept exist beyond reality and it wouldnt be affected even if the reality doesnt exist

 

[Lawiegg]

i think another qualification is that the concept exist beyond reality and it wouldnt be affected even if the reality doesnt exist

Like some higher dimensional concept?

 

[Livinmeme]

Like some higher dimensional concept?

not really is just exist out of reality like another realm