- 4,365
- 2,877
Title
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
To be a laser does something have to meet all, or just most of the requirements?
- Thread starter That_moron2
- Start date
-
- Tags
- laser feats
- 16,179
- 13,873
No. But it has to meet at least a few or enough to get hit with the certified
"yep probably a ******* uh, laser lmao".
What's important though, is that it doesn't meet the requirements to prove it isn't. If it has stuff that beams just legit don't do to the point it's actively noticeable, proving it becomes way, way, harder to the point you basically need a sol statement, but at that point it has a sol statement so the whole proving thing becomes meaningless.
"yep probably a ******* uh, laser lmao".
What's important though, is that it doesn't meet the requirements to prove it isn't. If it has stuff that beams just legit don't do to the point it's actively noticeable, proving it becomes way, way, harder to the point you basically need a sol statement, but at that point it has a sol statement so the whole proving thing becomes meaningless.
- 4,365
- 2,877
- Thread starter
- #3
What if something meets all the disqualifiers but is stated to be SoL?
- 3,166
- 1,474
I think that would probably be enough to consider it light speed (as long as the statement is reliable and not contradicted), just not a laser. So like no light manipulation ig?
- 16,179
- 13,873
Then it's SOL? Unless it's blatant hyperbole, it'd just be the speed of light regardless of how it acts because at that point the speed, the reason you likely want to prove it to begin with, is already confirmed?
Like if someone throws a punch and it's stated SOL, and we don't have reason to believe it's bullshit, you don't gotta prove the punch is actually a legit beam of light. It's SoL regardless of if it is or not.
