Tiering question

[Delta333]

So I have tried to find old threads regarding uncountable infinite and R-F being equalized but I found nothing so can someone explain to me why is it a thing again?

For example character A perceives 2-A as finite and small dust relative to itself thus Low 1-C thanks to being bigger than countable infinite. Now we have character B who perceives 2-A as fiction thus also Low 1-C despite the fact that there's a qualitative difference between a dust and fiction. Since the dust and lower fiction doesn't have the same existential level, character B should be theoretically stronger unless I miss something. So the current standard keeps bugging me up until now.

 

[Tatsumi504]

So I have tried to find old threads regarding uncountable infinite and R-F being equalized but I found nothing so can someone explain to me why is it a thing again?

For example character A perceives 2-A as finite and small dust relative to itself thus Low 1-C thanks to being bigger than countable infinite. Now we have character B who perceives 2-A as fiction thus also Low 1-C despite the fact that there's a qualitative difference between a dust and fiction. Since the dust and lower fiction doesn't have the same existential level, character B should be theoretically stronger unless I miss something. So the current standard keeps bugging me up until now.

Most likely because both are merely ways to determine an ontological difference.

Character B who sees a 2-A world as fiction doesn't mean he's seeing it as a speck of dust

 

[Delta333]

Character B who sees a 2-A world as fiction doesn't mean he's seeing it as a speck of dust

Of course it doesn't mean that he sees it as dust, that's entire point why I say them being both 5-D is weird.

 

[Delta333]

bump

 

[Delta333]

bump