Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably more like at least 3-C all the 3D tiers bulk of energy is empty space as they assume the average energy of the attack is constant throughout and for something like a galaxy that's probably much more then 99.9%. If you just stop them your not only not destroying them but your going around destroying the whole galaxy in one attack thing.Akreious said:I'm pretty sure that'd at least be 3-B since you'd also stop all rotation of galaxies in doing so but I'm not an expert on this, so
That doesn't make sense if you're destroying something out right like that you're overcoming all that energy.... also no way that this is 3-A just no way.Drag-O-Drawgon said:Considering that stopping planets is actually pretty high, (I think even higher than their GBE), this might actually be 3-A.
Also, I've seen a galaxy's movement energy put in at 3-B. So there's that too.
Wouldn't destroying a planet have to do the exact some thing tho? Your still overcoming the energy of that momentum if you completely destroy it.. also no need to get Hostile like that.Akreious said:So you're ignoring the fact that stopping a planet dead in its tracks actually require a crap ton of energy and are ignoring two people's suggestions that it is likely 3-B? Stopping something requires you to cancel out all momentum in that thing, which is mass and acceleration. Do you know how utterly massive a single galaxy is? Even taking into account that most of a galaxy is empty, stopping the momentum of all of it is AT MINIMUM 3-B.
It still doesn't seem right to imply that stop motion takes more energy then Atomizing.Drag-O-Drawgon said:You do not need to stop a planet to destroy it. Any object can still be taken apart or exploded even if it is in motion.