• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Dipper has the experience advantage due to having dealt with supernatural conflicts and science-fiction gadgets, whereas the Hunter is skilled at fighting more realistic creatures using realistic weapons. I'm not sure if Dipper's weapons are suppose to be standard equipment or optional equipment, and their range is considered as "higher" than Standard Melee Range, which is vague, whereas the Hunter's weapons have more clear long range listed on his profile. I feel like the Hunter would be skilled at navigating in a forest, but the characters are set as bloodlusted and Dipper has stealth skill on top of being more familiar with the location, so I imagine Dipper would be the most likely of the combatants to surprise the other. Dipper's durability is ranked as 25.796 kilograms of TNT, whereas the Hunter's firearms are ranked as 8.530 kilograms of TNT, so the Hunter's firearms wouldn't one-shot, and Dipper's Class 10 lifting strength would allow him to disarm the Hunter without issue if Dipper would get close enough.

My conclusion is that I think Dipper has enough of the right advantages for him to win the battle, so I vote for him winning.
 
Dipper has the experience advantage due to having dealt with supernatural conflicts and science-fiction gadgets, whereas the Hunter is skilled at fighting more realistic creatures using realistic weapons. I'm not sure if Dipper's weapons are suppose to be standard equipment or optional equipment, and their range is considered as "higher" than Standard Melee Range, which is vague, whereas the Hunter's weapons have more clear long range listed on his profile. I feel like the Hunter would be skilled at navigating in a forest, but the characters are set as bloodlusted and Dipper has stealth skill on top of being more familiar with the location, so I imagine Dipper would be the most likely of the combatants to surprise the other. Dipper's durability is ranked as 25.796 kilograms of TNT, whereas the Hunter's firearms are ranked as 8.530 kilograms of TNT, so the Hunter's firearms wouldn't one-shot, and Dipper's Class 10 lifting strength would allow him to disarm the Hunter without issue if Dipper would get close enough.

My conclusion is that I think Dipper has enough of the right advantages for him to win the battle, so I vote for him winning.
You mean 35 megajoules
 
Doesn't piercing damage also change some stuff up?
Ooh, it does, and I forgot to factor it. Good catch.
Also I doubt that's actually how gaps work otherwise even in a best case where their AP is exactly the same they could only take 8 hits from each other
Are you sure? Any positive whole number multiplied by 1 equals 1, so 1× would be neither a gap nor an advantage. It's very believable for me to make a mistake in math though, so if there is a better reason why I'm wrong, please tell me.
 
Doesn't piercing damage also change some stuff up? Also I doubt that's actually how gaps work otherwise even in a best case where their AP is exactly the same they could only take 8 hits from each other
Yup, that's not how it works. Durability mainly determines how difficult it is for an opponent to harm you physically with an 8x AP difference being easy enough to effectively oneshot. It's stamina that determines how much damage you can take.
 
Yup, that's not how it works. Durability mainly determines how difficult it is for an opponent to harm you physically with an 8x AP difference being easy enough to effectively oneshot. It's stamina that determines how much damage you can take.
That makes sense. In that case, Dipper could take more than two hits. He has enough stamina, and his is even better than the Hunter's. The Hunter's justification merely being "can run and fight for long periods" doesn't measure up against Dipper's feats.
 
Back
Top