Starcraft revision (1)

[Vzearr]

One of the many verses I plan to revise in accordance to my challenge. This is one of them, lets get straight into the debunks. But before that, heres some promo, come along and get your verse fixed!

Thread 'Vzearr's Challenge'

Jan 26, 2025

Welcome to the vzearr verse gauntlet​

Premise: Give me a verse, and I'll upgrade or downgrade it whilst also fixing the inverse scaling, etc. I have a lot of free time these coming weeks so yeah, I'll get to read and watch a bunch of anime and powerscale them.

1. How far can Vzearr get before a verse is unupgradable?
2. How far can Vzearr get before a verse is undebunkable?
3. How far can Vzearr get before a thread is debunked?

I plan to make every verse I work on perfect, so it may take a while.

I'm allowed to deny verses if they're too popular/require massive...

• Vzearr
• Replies: 324
• Forum: Fun and Games

• 

Dust to dust: Protoss Psionics Vaporize Zerglings​

Vaporising a human yields 0.06808199687 tons of tnt x 12 = 0.81698396244 tons of TNT over 10x less than what the calc got.
Damn, only one calc...
​

 

[Vzearr]

Bump.

 

[Vzearr]

Bump.

 

[DaReaperMan]

Starcraft: Yet Another Zergling Vapor Recalc

vsbattles.fandom.com

You'd need to go against this one, and considering zerglings wouldn't have 1:1 human mass... yeah it needs a proper calc.

Also not something that would downgrade everyone since 9-B is a thing anyways, and normal Marines won't be scaling to High Templars when I'm done with em lol

 

[Vzearr]

Bump.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

This could be recalc'd- if anything it is marginally higher, the original calc is just sort of lazy. It's fine to remove, but ideally one would use inverse square law to determine appropriate sizes and thus return appropriate vaporization values.