Sonic The Hedgehog: The lean mean Spin Dashing machine

[DarkDragonMedeus]

To be perfectly honest, I am kind of conflicted. I definitely support it being a pretty big speed amp, but I am a bit unsure if the method could be classified as calc stacking. The statements about supersonic and speed of light respectively are pretty valid and I'd be fine if it was being compared to a laser. But if it's just a statement of moving at lightspeed regularly, I will be neutral but perhaps lean towards agree. We did have one calc group member comment, but it depends if other calc group members decide to comment.

But I do prefer the high end if the calc remains accepted otherwise.

 

[Greenshifter]

To be perfectly honest, I am kind of conflicted. I definitely support it being a pretty big speed amp, but I am a bit unsure if the method could be classified as calc stacking. The statements about supersonic and speed of light respectively are pretty valid and I'd be fine if it was being compared to a laser. But if it's just a statement of moving at lightspeed regularly, I will be neutral but perhaps lean towards agree. We did have one calc group member comment, but it depends if other calc group members decide to comment.

But I do prefer the high end if the calc remains accepted otherwise.

I think you're dealing with the old calc DDM, the new one is a 54 times amp via a new method.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

I think you're dealing with the old calc DDM, the new one is a 54 times amp via a new method.

I was talking about the 54.744 specifically, but I did some rechecking and an I didn't even notice the 1000-100000000 methods. But I suppose 54x is fine then.

 

[ShakeResounding]

I was talking about the 54.744 specifically, but I did some rechecking and an I didn't even notice the 1000-100000000 methods.

Glad it got recalculated in time then, seeing that in the OP of this CRT might've given you a stroke lol

 

[Sans015]

To be perfectly honest, I am kind of conflicted. I definitely support it being a pretty big speed amp, but I am a bit unsure if the method could be classified as calc stacking. The statements about supersonic and speed of light respectively are pretty valid and I'd be fine if it was being compared to a laser. But if it's just a statement of moving at lightspeed regularly, I will be neutral but perhaps lean towards agree. We did have one calc group member comment, but it depends if other calc group members decide to comment.

But I do prefer the high end if the calc remains accepted otherwise.

What... There's no stacking.

The old method is invalid and mathematically inaccurate, the new method doesn't require any statements whatsoever...

 

[Greenshifter]

Seems like Sans woke up, tad bit too slow mate.

 

[Sans015]

I was talking about the 54.744 specifically, but I did some rechecking and an I didn't even notice the 1000-100000000 methods. But I suppose 54x is fine then.

It's 54.7x times, yes. It just compares how much the spin dash moves in comparison to the robots's movement. It does not require any statements of how fast the robots are.

 

[omegabronic]

considering that 3 staffs agreed, can this be applied?

 

[ShakeResounding]

Two admins (one being a Supermod) and a calc member for a math-based CRT. I think these are pretty sufficient parameters to be accepted

 

[ShakeResounding]

Guess nobody has a problem with this being applied? I'll start going through the profiles in a little while and adding the amp calc to the relevant Spin Dashers

 

[omegabronic]

we can make a crt for the stack of multipliers and super forms in another thread i presume?

 

[ShakeResounding]

So I know this is a CRT to have the multiplier accepted, but I think discussing scaling should be fine. I'll list out a chunk

• Tails
• Knuckles
• Amy (With the Amy Dash, Sonic Advance 2 & 3)
• Cream (Sonic Advance 2)
• Silver (Rivals 1 & 2)
• Rouge (Rivals 2)
• Blaze (With Burst Dash, Sonic Rush)

Edited Classic Sonic, Espio, Vector, Mighty, Shadow, and Metal. I'll get to the rest over time when I can, I'm pretty busy this Sunday

 

[ShakeResounding]

Amy, Cream, Silver, Rouge, and Blaze are all that's left to edit now, so this CRT should be wrapping up fairly soon

 

[omegabronic]

then all that will be left is the continuation of multipliers wank stacking

 

[Eseseso]

Speed boost multiplier seems fine

 

[ShakeResounding]

Been super busy with my last few weeks of university, but I did all the profiles except Silver and Cream.

If nobody else gets to it, I'll come back and finish this when I have a day off.

 

[That_moron2]

Don't multipliers have to be from a direct statement? Calcing a multiplier even if its accepted as such is a big no no from what I know.

 

[JJSliderman]

I guess that’s true, if something like SSJ2 and 3 aren’t accepted then maybe this also shouldn’t.

 

[Maverick_Zero_X]

I guess that’s true, if something like SSJ2 and 3 aren’t accepted then maybe this also shouldn’t.

That’s a false equivalence.

Anyway this thread was already applied.