So many questions with High Godly Regen...

[TheUnshakableOne]

I have so many questions right now...

• If a character is Omnipresent in the past, present, and future. On the old regen system he had Mid Godly regen for having his body, soul, and mind erased, but he regenerated. Under the new regen system is this character High Godly now???
  

• If a character Transcends time, and the multiverse, and previously had Mid Godly regen on the Old System. Would he be High Godly Regen now under the new system?
  

• If all life is tied to a "concept" in a verse. If someone destroys this "concept" which all life comes from. Though all life still remains after wards. Is that an anti-feat?
  

• If a character just severs the concept of "Life" from another character, but didn't destroy the source of all life, but Character B still regens. Is that High Godly regen?
  

• Is it possible for a character to have Mid Godly regen, but resistance to Regen Negation up to High Godly? Say, that Character A fought and perma killed a High Godly being with a weapon that Negates Immortalities, and Regen. Then Character A attacks Character B, and character B is has Mind, body, and soul destroyed, but still regens from that weapon.
  |

• A character that is Indepenent of time, worlds, dimensions and History, and Type 2 Acausality with no past, or future. On the old system had Mid Godly Regen. Would that suddenly make him High Godly Regen?
  

• Last question, If a character has only been seen outside the bounds of time, beyond time, or away from time. This character Had Mid Godly regen on the old system, would he suddenly have High Godly regen?

 

[Ogbunabali]

For the 1, 2, 3, 6 & 7 question, being erased from history/conceptually doesn't give you High-Godly. As the definition itself says, you need to be erased in all aspects in order to qualify.

"The ability to regenerate after erasure from all aspects of existence, such as from history, narrative/plot, and conceptual/information Destruction."
If all life is tied to a "concept" in a verse. If someone destroys this "concept" which all life comes from. Though all life still remains after wards. Is that an anti-feat?
If the concept of life is destroyed and no one dies, then it probably wasn't destroyed. Or if it's an abstract existence situation, it's probably type 2 and not 1.

Is it possible for a character to have Mid Godly regen, but resistance to Regen Negation up to High Godly? Say, that Character A fought and perma killed a High Godly being with a weapon that Negates Immortalities, and Regen. Then Character A attacks Character B, and character B is has Mind, body, and soul destroyed, but still regens from that weapon.
If character B regened from only from their soul, mind and body being destroyed, they'll probably have Mid-Godly with resistance to resistance negation.

 

[TheUnshakableOne]

If character B regened from only from their soul, mind and body being destroyed, they'll probably have Mid-Godly with resistance to resistance negation.

Using my example, the weapon has consistent feats of negating High Godly Regenerationn, but Character B has only shown mid godly regen, but he can resistant a weapon that can negate High Godly regen??? (if that makes sense)

 

[Ogbunabali]

If character B only regened from having his mind, body and soul being destroyed, he would only have Mid-Godly with resistance to immortality/Regenerationn negation. He wouldn't get High-Godly just because character A's weapon negates regen/immortality unless the weapon itself erases him conceptually/from a narrative/across history/etc.

And could you please stop using multiple question marks.

 

[Oliver_de_jesus]

using this thread to answer my question that goes on the issue of Regenerationn.

Is being deleted at a conceptual level superior or not to be deleted at a level of a higher dimension or being deleted from the present past and future?

 

[Ogbunabali]

It really depends on the verse, honestly. But at face value, being erased conceptually should be superior.