-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
should typeing of moves be considered when fighting pokemon
- Thread starter Faddizle
- Start date
- 491
- 55
Not sure if this should be on the Content Revision board, but yes. If someone were to shoot fire at a Charizard, it wouldn't take as much damage because Fire Types resist Fire. It may or may not be able to help turn the tide of battle.
However, I'm pretty sure this does not work the other way. If Charizard shot a Flamethrower at a generic enemy made entirely out of steel, then it would still do normal damage rather than double, unless that enemy has an explicit weakness to Fire attacks in its own verse.
However, I'm pretty sure this does not work the other way. If Charizard shot a Flamethrower at a generic enemy made entirely out of steel, then it would still do normal damage rather than double, unless that enemy has an explicit weakness to Fire attacks in its own verse.
Similar threads
