Sans KR

[Anonimoe7875]

This wiki is a bit strange a while back because we used the LV thing to say Flowey > Chara but when someone argued about Undyne we simply said it was "killing intent" and then procceced to put Undyne at Multiversal :v

Chara - Better at defensive hax(?)

Flowey - Better at everything else

Also about Genocide Frisk... Aren't they just a "corporeal" Chara?

Because they have everything abstract Chara has/Every source of Chara power (Real Knife, LV, Human Soul, Determination, place here something)

 

[Anderson2003]

Nope, Genocide Frisk isn't just a corporeal Chara. Its just Frisk killing everyone. Its a different being, however Chara does have an impact on that (even though she couldnt make the choice for Frisk, something like Arthas and Ner'Zhul). Chara was dead and was only revived upon the death of Flowey at the end of the GenoRun, however even during her death, her determination or somethiing of his did "lead" Frisk, according to herself.

 

[Anonimoe7875]

We don't know exactly when Chara revived one could argue it was at the start of the run our moments before they appearing

No, Chara didn't said anything like that, you can see it here

 

[Anderson2003]

"Why was I brought back to life? ... You." She doesn't understand how she came to be alive and questions how it happened, and due to her lines before.. "At first, I was so confused, our plain had failed, hadn't it?", it appears that she was revived at that moment, not before and that the last thing she truly remembers is dying.

."Together, we eradicated the enemy and became strong". She "guided" Frisk through the red letters, which clearly arent him. Or at least had some participation or influence.

 

[Anonimoe7875]

Someone could argue the exactly opposite using the same lines, just see a good version of Narra-Chara theory(?)

But still, thx for aswering my question

 

[Anderson2003]

I cant see how, really. The first part has no way to use other than this one, basic interpretation.

"Every number that increases, HP, LV, ATK, DEF.. Thats me." Every time you kill someone, every time you grow stronger and kill more and more, its Chara somehow.

NarraChara theory are mostly based on the context (hiding the fact that you arent the name you chose, for instance) and the person used (Me). Other than that, it almost has no fundamental evidence or suggestion that Chara could be the Narrator. The Narrator acts in a very specific way while Chara acts in another way. Narrator does jokes sometimes and is too different from the cold and mad mind of Chara. Chara is the type of guy that looks at someone and just says "In my way". Narrator is different.

 

[Anonimoe7875]

I don't want to write a wall of text from some theory that, i don't even believe, and my question was already answered