• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Raiden Shogun Low 1-A???

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah actually tried finding it, but only thing I found was this one in the History/Edits section


Where is Raiden mentioned here?
 
Immeasurable (Should be on this level by virtue of her existence. Can carry around her massive futa)

hold-up-his-writing-is-this-fire.png
 
Clearly, Raiden Shogun doesn't scale, and you obviously know better. I suppose Gianny was mad because of the True Will terminology passing for my elemental manipulation page, despite being only Type 1 BDE and he wanted to severely mock it.

@Giannysmag I'm giving you a formal warning, don't ever do something like that again. If you have an issue then presenting rightful debunking evidence in a CRT is the right choice, but not vandalism.
 
Well I can't exactly do that when you decide to close the thread while we where still debating stuff now can I?
No one is stopping you from creating a CRT, obviously.
 
No one is stopping you from creating a CRT, obviously.
There was a CRT and we were debating but you got it closed. And you know full well that creating a new CRT isn't efficient at all, just look at the 4-A downgrade. What always ends up happening is you make some huge upgrade often with very flimsy evidence, speed dial all of your admin buddies most of which barely know anything about the verse who then blindly agree with you and then we gotta wait for someone to make a revision which then takes forever (it took me like 3 different threads to kill that subrelativistic calc you did earlier this year) because unlike you, we don't have an army of mods to summon on command. And so for all the time the usually blatantly wrong information you put up stays there for weeks and months
 
There was a CRT and we were debating but you got it closed. And you know full well that creating a new CRT isn't efficient at all
The CRT had above the threshold number of approvals to be applied. You told me a day before you made your reply, that you were spending hours on your draft; I suppose the reply was the objections you had to provide, especially since you "likely" missed some stuff, meaning you aren't certain of other issues with the blog. Do you think it was easy for me to make the sandbox, gather scans/references and hold CRTs? As for the sub-rel calculation, it passed because the lightning speed for Raiden's katana was rejected by the calculation group, and it directly pertains to the rules of the wiki, which we can unanimously agree to.

Also, I do not think the evidence I provided is anyhow flimsy; I properly indexed the references for those scans; everyone can check out where those pieces of evidence even came from, and connect it to the lore of the story.

Most of the scans aren't even the ones I collected myself; whatever evidence of certain superpowers I was sent, I assign abilities and give descriptions to it according to the pieces of evidence and other lore information provided by the users who sent me the images.
 
The CRT had above the threshold number of approvals to be applied. You told me a day before you made your reply, that you were spending hours on your draft; I suppose the reply was the objections you had to provide, especially since you "likely" missed some stuff, meaning you aren't certain of other issues with the blog. Do you think it was easy for me to make the sandbox, gather scans/references and hold CRTs?
I never implied that you didn't spend a lot of time on the sandbox and it's obvious that there was a lot of effort put in but putting a lot of effort on smth =/= that being correct. Also yes that response was most of my issues and we were still debating a lot of those when you closed the thread
Also, I do not think the evidence I provided is anyhow flimsy; I properly indexed the references for those scans; everyone can check out where those pieces of evidence even came from, and connect it to the lore of the story.
Which I and a bunch of other supporters did and found that the context proved you wrong, which is why I call your evidence flimsy
Most of the scans aren't even the ones I collected myself; whatever evidence of certain superpowers I was sent, I assign abilities and give descriptions to it according to the pieces of evidence and other lore information provided by the users who sent me the images.
Then why are you even the one handling such a massive revision? When all you have to go of off are fragmentary pieces of evidence without the greater context it's very easy to get things wrong (which you did), especially since you've told me that you don't even actively play the game
 
They're more knowledgeable in Genshin lore, I'm knowledgeable in the wiki's terminologies and Honkai. If they have no objectification of what I put in the description is wrong, then I don't think there should be an issue; they're supporters as well.

Which I and a bunch of other supporters did and found that the context was wrong, which is why I call your evidence flimsy

The bandwagon can hit hard, do not push it.
 
Last edited:
They're knowledgeable in Genshin lore, I'm knowledgeable in the wiki's terminologies and Honkai. If they have no objectification of what I put in the description is wrong, then I don't think there should be an issue; they're supporters as well.
Afaik, other than Furina003, Legarde and probably Breakdown. I don't see you trying to discuss the feats to other genshin supporters such as Giannysmag, Woomica and Shey (though, I could be wrong) and for us on the discord server personally. Yeah, it seems like a personal project (even though it isn't) as it wasn't even discussed once (I discussed it first when I saw that page that you're making).

The only problem here is probably about the fact that you haven't even tried talking about those feats to other supporters too (in which, they could give you the full context of the feats mentioned and if it would give them these abilities or is the justification solid enough) before making the page and applying all of this. It's kinda hard when you only discuss about it to like the other half.
 
They're knowledgeable in Genshin lore, I'm knowledgeable in the wiki's terminologies and Honkai. If they have no objectification of what I put in the description is wrong, then I don't think there should be an issue; they're supporters as well.
Yes because there has never been a case of a verses supporters intentionally ommiting context to try and get the highest ratings/most hax possible cough god of war cough, espcecially when they have a prominent staff member on their side that can make passing said ratings much easier
The bandwagon can hit hard, do not push it.
It's not a bandwagon if there's evidence, it's just a bunch of people saw through how flimsy or wrong a lot of the editions were
 
Afaik, other than Furina003, Legarde and probably Breakdown. I don't see you trying to discuss the feats to other genshin supporters such as Giannysmag, Woomica and Shey (though, I could be wrong) and for us on the discord server personally. Yeah, it seems like a personal project (even though it isn't) as it wasn't even discussed once (I discussed it first when I saw that page that you're making).

The only problem here is probably about the fact that you haven't tried to talk about those feats to other supporters too (in which, they could give you the full context of the feats mentioned and if it would give them these abilities or is the justification solid enough) before making the page and applying all of this. It's kinda hard when you only discuss about it to like the other half.
I can choose who I work with and whose judgements I should trust. Do you think I'd speak to Shey after being horrendously destructive and toxic in my server? As for Gianny, I think it should be clear why I also don't trust his judgement either; you, however, were present and you had no objections towards the sandbox at all, so I am not sure why this is a problem. Woomica was present during my revision and I actually edited my sandbox according to his criticisms which were appealing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top