• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Questions about Dimensional Tiering

Status
Not open for further replies.
First of all I wanna apologies if the thread seems unorganised and messy.
Second of all I’m new to dimensional tiering and i apologise for any mistakes i may make.

But anyways.

Well, i have been to other websites who say that dimensional tiering is bs.

some say that a character winning from a other one because he a 1-A and the other character is 2-A is a invalid answer and doesn’t make sense because the answer why they win is because he is a number higher so it shouldn’t be count as a valid answer.

while other say that the differences between the 5th and 4th dimension is not that big and that they can interact with each other Because it’s only one dimension of difference.

and what should be the difference between a fight between characters with and without dimensional tiering in mind.

and i read the following

 
Last edited:
We only use dimensional tiering for fictions that explicitly treat higher dimensions as qualitatively and/or infinitely superior to lower ones nowadays. Please read our information pages regarding the subject.
 
See here:


 
No problem.

I will lock this thread then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top