• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Question about finite time and space

The total space would be into Tier 2, but not 2-A afaik.
Technically speaking, how can it be High 3-A if infinity can't be instantiated in reality? Wouldn't the biggest possible rating be layers into 3-A?
 
Technically speaking, how can it be High 3-A if infinity can't be instantiated in reality? Wouldn't the biggest possible rating be layers into 3-A?
well if it cant be instantiated the difference between dimensions becomes impossible so that also affects lower dimensions which 3D is built upon so diddy bluds 0D
 
Technically speaking, how can it be High 3-A if infinity can't be instantiated in reality? Wouldn't the biggest possible rating be layers into 3-A?
You'd still have infinite snap shots between two points, just not infinite^infinite which is what a usual time axis gives you.
 
You'd still have infinite snap shots between two points, just not infinite^infinite which is what a usual time axis gives you.
So, despite the fact that it is stated, verbatim, that infinity can't exist physically, we would just...ignore part of the statement? But, at that point, why not ignore the statement as a whole to make the verse into tier 2?
 
So, despite the fact that it is stated, verbatim, that infinity can't exist physically, we would just...ignore part of the statement? But, at that point, why not ignore the statement as a whole to make the verse into tier 2?
I think you're missing my point here.

3-A gets Low 2-C because you have a transinfinite number of snapshots. As you have an infinite number of points with an infinite number of points between any two points. Which is 3-A * infinity^infinity

But having a finite timeline, you have infinite number of points between points, but only a finite number of points. So its 3-A * infinite^finite which is some degree of High 3-A.

By having a bunch of these spaces, let's say an infinite number, you'd get into tier 2 because you'd eventually replace that ^finite with a ^infinite.
 
I think you're missing my point here.

3-A gets Low 2-C because you have a transinfinite number of snapshots. As you have an infinite number of points with an infinite number of points between any two points. Which is 3-A * infinity^infinity

But having a finite timeline, you have infinite number of points between points, but only a finite number of points. So its 3-A * infinite^finite which is some degree of High 3-A.

By having a bunch of these spaces, let's say an infinite number, you'd get into tier 2 because you'd eventually replace that ^finite with a ^infinite.
But that's the thing? I don't disagree with your explanation, I'm saying the moment you mention the word "infinite" it becomes a completely different case from the one I'm proposing to you.

Okay, space and time aren't infinite. They just can't be. It means that the verse has finite space and finite time. In more crude term, be it the spatial aspect of the verse (the universes or other stuff) and/or the timelines themselves are finite. It may end god knows when, but it will end, it will not have any "infinity" attached to it. Even "within" it.

Here, you're postulating that despite the fact infinity can't exist, you're still suggesting the existence of "an infinite number of points between points" which obviously can't be the case unless you purposely evade the statement in some way.

The case here is as follows : A verse with a finite number of universes (different sizes), with a finite number of timelines/parallel worlds (kinda the same), where infinity can't exist beyond the concept itself (meaning it can't be applied in any way physically).
 
, you're still suggesting the existence of "an infinite number of points between points" which obviously can't be the case unless you purposely evade the statement in some way.
I'm explaining how our Tiering System would work with the stuff you provided in your OP. If conceptually an infinite value can't exist, then they'd all be stuck at varies degrees of 3-A with an insubstantial 4D plane separating the 3-A realms.
 
I'm explaining how our Tiering System would work with the stuff you provided in your OP. If conceptually an infinite value can't exist, then they'd all be stuck at varies degrees of 3-A with an insubstantial 4D plane separating the 3-A realms.
Okay, my bad then, I thought you read the whole thread. Thank you for your answer
 
Why only applying this logic to time when it can also apply to space as well ?
Space being finite is covered by the base Tiering system already. Anything below High e-A is a finite 3D spatial number.
 
Space being finite is covered by the base Tiering system already. Anything below High e-A is a finite 3D spatial number.
High
EA_logo_Signature.jpg
.
 
Back
Top