• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Question about destroying multi universes

Just realised zeno also should be downgraded to low 2-c because all of his feats are individually destroying the universes
An alternate future zeno erased a timeline that contains 12 or 18 universes and scales above the angels.
 
I'mma do this carefully and smartly.

Let's say that a character can wipe multiple planets.
What is the problem? That means he can just go planet after planet, destroying them world by world kinda like buu did. That doesn't make the feat 4-C/4-B, that makes it 5-A because assuming that he wiped out all of them at a time is a far stretch which cannot be used without further context.

The same applies to universes. If they said "destroy a multiverse" then yeah that is blatantly 2-C but they didn't, they said multiple universes which means that it might not be simultaneously.
How in the world does that prove he didnt in one go
 
It’s not proof. U can’t prove anything with only one sentence to go off of. He’s just saying he thinks it’s more conservative to say 5a instead of 4c/4b
 
What I mean to say is, the alien x statement is either Universal,Universal+,lowMultiversal, or higher. And most people think it’s safer to go with a lowball.
 
What I mean to say is, the alien x statement is either Universal,Universal+,lowMultiversal, or higher. And most people think it’s safer to go with a lowball.
No is far safer to go with Low 2-C probally 2-C because always going with the safest option isnt the most logic in this case
 
Also name a character that destroyed several universes and is low 2-C because we dont know if he did in one go name it
 
What I mean to say is, the alien x statement is either Universal,Universal+,lowMultiversal, or higher. And most people think it’s safer to go with a lowball.
No higher than low multiversal tho. That's why I proposed Low 2-C possibly 2-C.
 
You can make a thread on it but I think it's safe to have a conversation with knowledge staffs first or several but you can still make a thread on it for it to be possibly accepted tho you have my support on Low 2C possibly 2C.
 
Back
Top