- 4,239
- 3,878
Imagine a 2-A multiverse with each universe being infinite. Does this qualify for Low 1-C (5D)?
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Question about 2-A and Low 1-C
- Thread starter Accelerated_Evolution
- Start date
- 6,914
- 6,631
Please see our site FAQ regarding this matter.
- 15,341
- 11,124
No, this alone is not enough for Low 1-C, it's still just 2-A.
Experiment12
Username Only- 263
- 118
Remains at level 2-A. The unique qualification for Low 1-C must be ontological evidence, such as Reality > Fiction
- 32,737
- 37,876
Spatial size of the space-time continuums themselves mean nothing in the grand scheme of things to obtaining Tier 2 or 1. Since we already consider time to be infinite by default, and a single point in time containing a countably-infinite number of 3D snapshots (Hence why destroying/erasing even a single second or smallest unit of time nets you High 3-A), with time being infinite, you end up having an uncountably infinite number of 3D snapshots needed to give you 4D Low 2-C.
An infinite number of 92-billion-light-year-wide space-time continuums and an infinite number of infinite-sized space-time continuums are the same level of 2-A. They can't be Low 1-C unless the 5D space between said space-times is of a significant-enough size.
The R>F thing and qualitative superiority stuff is currently under discussion, as that might be relegated to exclusively 1-A and above.
An infinite number of 92-billion-light-year-wide space-time continuums and an infinite number of infinite-sized space-time continuums are the same level of 2-A. They can't be Low 1-C unless the 5D space between said space-times is of a significant-enough size.
The R>F thing and qualitative superiority stuff is currently under discussion, as that might be relegated to exclusively 1-A and above.
Last edited:
Similar threads
