Qualitative supériority question

[SkyBlade6635]

Hi, I have a small question that's been bothering me here, and it concerns Tier 1-A and the layers. We agree that Tier 1-A is obtained via qualitative superiority, meaning by completely detaching from the quantitative category, such that any permutation, union, extension, or combination from 11-C to Low 1-A cannot reach 1-A due to its qualitative nature, right?
Now we agree that to have 1-A you need either an R>F (Reality > Fiction) or a BDE Type 3. So suppose:
Baseline 1-A → qualitative transcendence (R>F) → 1-A (1 layer) → qualitative transcendence (R>F) → 1-A (2 layers) ...
Okay, now my question is: Can we have a BDE Type 3 above a baseline 1-A to create a layer in the same way as R>F? Like:
Baseline 1-A → qualitative transcendence (BDE Type 3) → 1-A (1 layer) → qualitative transcendence (BDE Type 3) → 1-A (2 layers) ...
Personally, I think this is not possible. Given that the principle of BDE Type 3 is to be beyond the concept of dimensions (which represents the entire quantitative category), I told myself that if we have a BDE Type 3 above a baseline 1-A, it presupposes that this baseline 1-A is part of a quantitative category, whereas no — it is already in another system that is qualitative, like:
Quantitative category (11-C to Low 1-A) → qualitative category (1-A to 1-A+)
What do you think?

 

[Hecky2222]

1-A isn't restricted to not have dimensions, space-time, mathematics, whatsoever.

Just not in way it is shared with lower hierarchy. So answer to your question would be: Yes, you can have

It would be like 1-A having own dimensions, mathematics, quantity adding up in own layer, whereas layer that is above baseline would be inaccessible to the completely.

 

[SkyBlade6635]

1-A isn't restricted to not have dimensions, space-time, mathematics, whatsoever.

Just not in way it is shared with lower hierarchy. So answer to your question would be: Yes, you can have

It would be like 1-A having own dimensions, mathematics, quantity adding up in own layer, whereas layer that is above baseline would be inaccessible to the completely.

Ah, makes sense I didn't think about that. Thanks for clarifying