proposed new tiers for the tiering page

[Thelastmlg]

(this is literally my first contribuition to this wiki)

so i thought that the tiering system page needed new things on it

i konw some of them are used in characters profiles but i'm talking about the tiering system page itself

high 8-C = large building level (i.e. skycrapers)

low 7-C = village level

high 7-C = large town level

high 7-B = large city level

low 7-A = small mountain level

high 7-A = mountain range level (mountain chain)

low 6-C = small island level (skerries)

high 6-C = large island level

low 6-B = small country level

high 6-B = large country level (i.e. russia)

low 6-A = multi-country level

high 6-A = multi-continet level

high 5-C = small planet level (i.e. pluto)

low 5-B = large moon level

high 5-B = multi-planetetary level

high 5-A = multi-large planet level

low 4-C = small star level

high 4-C = multi-small star level

low 4-B = large star level

high 4-B = large solar system level

high 4-A = multi-large solar system level

low 3-C = dwarf galaxy level

high 3-C = large galaxy level

high 3-B = multi-large galaxy level

low 3-A = observable universe level

 

[AstralKing7]

i actually agree with the 5A one tho cause i get confused sometimes when i see some characters are large planet level as 5A and others are Dwarf star level as 5A. IMO its confusing to me i dont know about others tho

 

[ShadowWarrior1999]

High 5-C overlaps with Low 5-B, so that isn't needed. The moons Titan and Ganymede are larger than the planet Mercury.

Multi-star level would just be 4-B if it's a binary system or if it's a star cluster, then that's 4-A.

3-B is at minimum the distance between the Milky Way and Amdromeda (2.5 million LY). Having the AP to destroy IC 1101 (6 million LY) is already 3-B. High 3-C and High 3-B would be redundant.

 

[Thelastmlg]

so what if

1. i swap high 5-C with low 5-C

2. high 4-C becomes multi-small star

3. low 4-B becomes large star

4. low 3-B or high 3-C becomes large galaxy

5. 3-B just disappers from the post since it would be multi-galaxy

6. make high 3-B observable universe level (or should i leave it for low 3-A?)

 

[ShadowWarrior1999]

so what if

1. i swap high 5-C with low 5-C

2. high 4-C becomes multi-small star

3. low 4-B becomes large star

4. low 3-B or high 3-C becomes large galaxy

5. 3-B just disappers from the post since it would be multi-galaxy

6. make high 3-B observable universe level (or should i leave it for low 3-A?)

The tiering system is fine as it is. By the way Low 5-C would overlap with High 6-A so there's no reason to add that either.

 

[CaptainFinnigan]

This all seems to be the same but with added adjectives

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

This really doesn't seem necessary.

 

[Thelastmlg]

it isn't

is just a suggestion

hence the word proposed