• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Possible changes to Regenerationn

Status
Not open for further replies.

JustSomeWeirdo

He/Him
VS Battles
Thread Moderator
7,868
2,803
The Regenerationn page has never specified if someone's Regenerationn is either reattaching parts like, for example, Dio Brando, or completely regrowing their parts, like, for example, Cell, or maybe a mix between the 2, so I thought maybe I could get this changed, as it could help users who have no knowledge on a character with regen as a reattacher or a regrowth user. Like, for instance, say Dio Brando has been blown to bits and starts regenerating, he has to reattach his body, but someone who has never heard of Dio's character could thing it just regrows, and says "Dio Brando via Regen", while the other combatant could've just gotten rid of some of Dio's body parts via BFR, canceling a full regen and leaving him permanently wounded. While someone who hasn't heard of Cell could think that this would work against him "Oh just BFR the arm" or something along the lines of that, while he actually regrows his body.

The current "Types of Regen" could be changed to "Levels of Regen"

Types of Regen:

Reattachment - The user reattaches their body parts(Peaks at High-Mid)

Regrowth - The user regrows their body parts (No peak)

True Regen - The user can regrow and reattach (No peak)


Alternate Types:

Automatic Reattachment - The body parts are automatically drawn to their original body

Forced Reattachment - The user has to take the body parts and attach it themselves (Ex: Pillar Men and Vampires once the limb is actually destroyed completely)

True Reattachment - The user's body parts will automatically be drawn to the original body, but the user can reattach the parts themselves to speed up the process (Ex: Dio, Straizo)

Automatic Regrowth - The user's body will automatically heal itself and regrow any missing parts (Ex: Zamasu, Notorious B.I.G.)

Forced Regrowth - The user has to force their body to heal itself (Ex: Namekians, Cell)

True Regrowth - The user will automatically heal itself, but can force themselves to heal specific parts faster

Automatic Regen - The user will automatically be able to regrow and reattach body parts

Forced Regen - The user will have to force themselves to both regrow and reattach

True Regenerationn (for a lack of a better name...) - The user will automatically regrow and reattach, but can force themselves to heal specific parts faster
 
Personally i don't see any problem with the current system, it's simple and sufficient for our needs.

Not to mention that mention that what you are suggesting doesn't cover everything, it seems more complicated and it would almost impossible to do such a massive change over 10000 profiles.

Even the AP revision last year was a pain in the ass that lased several days and this is on a different level.
 
I know this would take a long time to get into motion, and I did add an explaination at the top of the OP
 
Alright, I realize how this revision is flawed

This can be closed unless others would like to discuss
 
I agree with Gwynbleiddd.
 
I agree, I honestly only originally made this in consideration for new members/those without knowledge of characters

After realizing how flawed this revision is, it can be closed at any time
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top